„Wojna ducha” na Wschodzie. Propaganda i nauka w służbie ruchów narodowych

W. Borodziej, M. Górny
{"title":"„Wojna ducha” na Wschodzie. Propaganda i nauka w służbie ruchów narodowych","authors":"W. Borodziej, M. Górny","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0013.2781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the issue of the political involvement of people of science and culture in Central and Eastern Europe during World War I and in the immediate aftermath. In comparison with the phenomenon of the “war of the spirits” known in the historiography, so far observed mainly in France, Germany and Great Britain, the regional variation of this phenomenon was characterized by a greater informational value and a stronger relationship between journalistic writing and professional science. In particular, the representatives of such disciplines as physical (racial) anthropology and geography in the service of their national movements and governments engaged the whole arsenal of scientific means of persuasion: they used the language of a particular science, created coherent and logical, formally correct theories, argued, while maintaining the appropriate forms, with ideological opponents. These features of the discourse, among other things, contributed to the viability of their scientific theories from World War I, which – unlike analogous creations of Western European luminaries of art and science – still retain the right to exist in a professional academic and journalistic communities in Central and Eastern Europe.\n\n","PeriodicalId":239308,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Humanistyczny","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Humanistyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the issue of the political involvement of people of science and culture in Central and Eastern Europe during World War I and in the immediate aftermath. In comparison with the phenomenon of the “war of the spirits” known in the historiography, so far observed mainly in France, Germany and Great Britain, the regional variation of this phenomenon was characterized by a greater informational value and a stronger relationship between journalistic writing and professional science. In particular, the representatives of such disciplines as physical (racial) anthropology and geography in the service of their national movements and governments engaged the whole arsenal of scientific means of persuasion: they used the language of a particular science, created coherent and logical, formally correct theories, argued, while maintaining the appropriate forms, with ideological opponents. These features of the discourse, among other things, contributed to the viability of their scientific theories from World War I, which – unlike analogous creations of Western European luminaries of art and science – still retain the right to exist in a professional academic and journalistic communities in Central and Eastern Europe.
东方的 "精神之战"。宣传和科学为民族运动服务
本文讨论了第一次世界大战期间及战后中欧和东欧科学和文化界人士的政治参与问题。与迄今为止主要在法国、德国和英国观察到的史学上的“精神之战”现象相比,这种现象的地区差异具有更大的信息价值和更强的新闻写作与专业科学之间的关系。特别是,物理(种族)人类学和地理学等学科的代表们在为他们的民族运动和政府服务时,运用了所有科学的说服手段:他们使用特定科学的语言,创造连贯的、合乎逻辑的、形式上正确的理论,在保持适当形式的同时,与意识形态上的对手进行辩论。这些话语的特点,除其他外,促成了他们从第一次世界大战开始的科学理论的可行性,这些理论——与西欧艺术和科学名人的类似创造不同——仍然保留着在中欧和东欧的专业学术和新闻团体中存在的权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信