aborto em Dworkin, Habermas e Rawls

Logeion: Filosofia da Informação Pub Date : 2023-06-27 DOI:10.21728/logeion.2023v9nesp.p15-25

Delamar José Volpato Dutra

{"title":"aborto em Dworkin, Habermas e Rawls","authors":"Delamar José Volpato Dutra","doi":"10.21728/logeion.2023v9nesp.p15-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ALEXY, Robert. The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism. [B. L. Paulson and S. L. Paulson: Begriff und Geltung des Rechts]. Oxford: Clardeon Press, 2002. \nBEAUCHAMP, Tom L., CHILDRESS, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. \nBECKENKAMP, Joãosinho. Direito como exterioridade na legislação prática em Kant. Ethic@. V. 2, n. 2, 2003. p. 151-171. [http://www.cfh.ufsc.br/ethic@]. \nBICKEL, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch. 1962. \nBRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, promulgada em 05.10.1988. \nBRASIL. Decreto-Lei 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Código Penal. \nBRASIL. Lei 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002. Institui o Código Civil. \nBRASIL. Lei 5.869, de 11 de janeiro de 1973. Código de processo civil. \nBRÜSEKE, Franz Josef. A modernidade técnica. In LEIS, Héctor Ricardo, SCHERERWARREN, Ilse, COSTA, Sérgio [orgs.]. Modernidade crítica e modernidade acrítica. Florianópolis: Cidade Futura, 2001. [adendo]. \nCODIGNOLA, Maria Moneti. From Generation to Production: How the Meaning of “Coming to the World” Changes in the Era of Reproductive Techniques. ethic@. Florianópolis, v.3, n.2, 2004. p. 99-106. \nCOSTA, Sérgio [orgs.]. Modernidade crítica e modernidade acrítica. Florianópolis: Cidade Futura, 2001. p. 177-198. \nDUTRA, Delamar José Volpato. Dominação da natureza e dominação do homem: verso e anverso do iluminismo. In LEIS, Héctor Ricardo, SCHERER-WARREN, Ilse, \nDWORKIN, Ronald. Freedom's Law: the Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford Unversity Press, 1996. \nDWORKIN, Ronald. Life’s Dominion. An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Vintage Books, 1994. \nDWORKIN, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000. \nELY, John Hart. The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade. Yale LawJournal. V. 82, 1973. p. 920-949. \nGUYER, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. \nGUYER, Paul. Kant’s Deduction of the Principles of Right. In TIMMONS, Mark [ed.]. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: interpretative essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. p. 23-64. \nHABERMAS, Jürgen. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2001. \nHABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e democracia: entre faticidade e validade. [v. I]. [Trad. F. B. Siebeneichler: Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats]. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997. \nHABERMAS, Jürgen. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991. \nHECK, José N. Direito subjetivo e dever jurídico interno em Kant. Texto inédito. \nHOLMES, Oliver Wendel. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review. V. X, n. 8, 1897. p. 457-478. \nHRUSCHKA, Joachim. The Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant’s “Metaphysics of Morals”. Law and Philosophy. V. 23, 2004. p. 45–72. \nLOCKE, John. Carta acerca da tolerância. [1689]. [Trad. A. Aiex: Epistola de tolerantia]. 2. ed. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1978. \nMacINTYRE, Alasdair. Whose justice? Which rationality? London: Duckworth,1988. \nMUNZER, Stephen Rawls. Kant and Property Rights in Body Parts. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. V. VI, n. 2, 1993. p. 319-41. \nRAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. [Revised Edition]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. [First ed. 1971]. \nRAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press","PeriodicalId":227136,"journal":{"name":"Logeion: Filosofia da Informação","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Logeion: Filosofia da Informação","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21728/logeion.2023v9nesp.p15-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

ALEXY, Robert. The Argument from Injustice. A Reply to Legal Positivism. [B. L. Paulson and S. L. Paulson: Begriff und Geltung des Rechts]. Oxford: Clardeon Press, 2002. BEAUCHAMP, Tom L., CHILDRESS, James F. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 5. ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. BECKENKAMP, Joãosinho. Direito como exterioridade na legislação prática em Kant. Ethic@. V. 2, n. 2, 2003. p. 151-171. [http://www.cfh.ufsc.br/ethic@]. BICKEL, Alexander. The Least Dangerous Branch. 1962. BRASIL. Constituição da República Federativa do Brasil, promulgada em 05.10.1988. BRASIL. Decreto-Lei 2.848, de 7 de dezembro de 1940. Código Penal. BRASIL. Lei 10.406, de 10 de janeiro de 2002. Institui o Código Civil. BRASIL. Lei 5.869, de 11 de janeiro de 1973. Código de processo civil. BRÜSEKE, Franz Josef. A modernidade técnica. In LEIS, Héctor Ricardo, SCHERERWARREN, Ilse, COSTA, Sérgio [orgs.]. Modernidade crítica e modernidade acrítica. Florianópolis: Cidade Futura, 2001. [adendo]. CODIGNOLA, Maria Moneti. From Generation to Production: How the Meaning of “Coming to the World” Changes in the Era of Reproductive Techniques. ethic@. Florianópolis, v.3, n.2, 2004. p. 99-106. COSTA, Sérgio [orgs.]. Modernidade crítica e modernidade acrítica. Florianópolis: Cidade Futura, 2001. p. 177-198. DUTRA, Delamar José Volpato. Dominação da natureza e dominação do homem: verso e anverso do iluminismo. In LEIS, Héctor Ricardo, SCHERER-WARREN, Ilse, DWORKIN, Ronald. Freedom's Law: the Moral Reading of the American Constitution. Oxford: Oxford Unversity Press, 1996. DWORKIN, Ronald. Life’s Dominion. An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Vintage Books, 1994. DWORKIN, Ronald. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2000. ELY, John Hart. The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade. Yale LawJournal. V. 82, 1973. p. 920-949. GUYER, Paul. Kant on Freedom, Law, and Happiness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000. GUYER, Paul. Kant’s Deduction of the Principles of Right. In TIMMONS, Mark [ed.]. Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals: interpretative essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002. p. 23-64. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Die Zukunft der menschlichen Natur. Auf dem Weg zu einer liberalen Eugenik? Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, 2001. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Direito e democracia: entre faticidade e validade. [v. I]. [Trad. F. B. Siebeneichler: Faktizität und Geltung: Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaats]. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro, 1997. HABERMAS, Jürgen. Erläuterungen zur Diskursethik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1991. HECK, José N. Direito subjetivo e dever jurídico interno em Kant. Texto inédito. HOLMES, Oliver Wendel. The Path of the Law. Harvard Law Review. V. X, n. 8, 1897. p. 457-478. HRUSCHKA, Joachim. The Permissive Law of Practical Reason in Kant’s “Metaphysics of Morals”. Law and Philosophy. V. 23, 2004. p. 45–72. LOCKE, John. Carta acerca da tolerância. [1689]. [Trad. A. Aiex: Epistola de tolerantia]. 2. ed. São Paulo: Abril Cultural, 1978. MacINTYRE, Alasdair. Whose justice? Which rationality? London: Duckworth,1988. MUNZER, Stephen Rawls. Kant and Property Rights in Body Parts. Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence. V. VI, n. 2, 1993. p. 319-41. RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. [Revised Edition]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. [First ed. 1971]. RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press

查看原文本刊更多论文

德沃金，哈贝马斯和罗尔斯

亚历克西斯,罗伯特。《不公正的论点》。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。[B。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该镇的土地面积为。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。Tom L. BEAUCHAMP, CHILDRESS, James F.《生物医学伦理学原理》。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该县的总面积为，其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。BECKENKAMP Joãosinho。在康德的实践立法中，法律是外在的。Ethic@。2003年第2期第2期。151 - -171页。[http://www.cfh.ufsc.br/ethic@]。BICKEL亚历山大。最不危险的分支，1962年。巴西。巴西联邦共和国宪法，1988年10月5日颁布。巴西。1940年12月7日第2848号法令。刑法。巴西。2002年1月10日第10406号法律。建立民法典。巴西。1973年1月11日第5869号法律。民事诉讼法典。布鲁塞克，弗朗茨·约瑟夫。技术现代化。在莱斯，赫克托·Ricardo，谢勒·沃伦，伊尔丝，COSTA，塞尔吉奥。批判的现代性和批判的现代性。florianopolis:未来之城，2001。(补充)。科迪尼奥拉，玛丽亚·莫奈尼。从世代到生产:生殖技术时代“来到世界”的含义如何变化。ethic@。florianopolis, v.3, n.2, 2004。99 - -106页。科斯塔，sergio [orgs.]。批判的现代性和批判的现代性。florianopolis:未来之城，2001。177 - -198页。DUTRA, Delamar jose Volpato。自然的统治和人的统治:启蒙运动的正反两面。在法律,赫克托耳谢勒——沃伦·李嘉图,伊尔丝,德沃金,罗纳德。Freedom'定律:美国宪法的精神阅读。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该县的总面积为，其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。德沃金,罗纳德。生活’的统治。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，这个县的土地面积为。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该县的总面积为，其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。德沃金,罗纳德。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该县的土地面积为，其中土地面积为。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该县的总面积为，其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。伊利，约翰·哈特。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，这个县的面积为。耶鲁LawJournal。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。920 - -949页。盖伊,保罗。《自由、法律和幸福》。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该县的总面积为，其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。盖伊,保罗。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该镇的土地面积为。在蒂蒙斯，马克[编]。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，这个县的面积为。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该县的总面积为，其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。-64年第23页。哈贝马斯(jurgen。它的自然栖息地是亚热带或热带潮湿的低地森林。汪开炮Weg祖茂堂解释liberalen Eugenik ?= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该镇的土地面积为。哈贝马斯(jurgen。法律与民主:在命令性与有效性之间。[v。(我)。(反式。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，这个县的面积为。里约热内卢de Janeiro:巴西天气，1997年。哈贝马斯(jurgen。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。康德的主观权利与内部法律义务。跨文本。福尔摩斯，奥利弗·温德尔。《法律之路》。《哈佛法律评论》。《X档案》，第8期，1897年。457 - -478页。HRUSCHKA勒夫。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，这个县的面积为。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。45—72页。洛克,约翰。关于宽容的信。[1689]。(反式。A. Aiex:宽容的书信。2. sao保罗是巴西东北部巴伊亚州的一个自治市。麦金太尔,阿拉斯代尔。杰斯特谁的?这rationality ?伦敦:1988年达克沃斯。蒙泽，斯蒂芬·罗尔斯。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。加拿大法律和法理学杂志。V. VI, n. 2, 1993。319 - -41页。罗尔斯,约翰。他的父亲是一名律师，母亲是一名律师。(修改版)。= =地理= =根据美国人口普查，该县的总面积为，其中土地和(3.064平方公里)水。[第一版，1971年]。罗尔斯,约翰。政治Liberalism。纽约:哥伦比亚大学出版社

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Logeion: Filosofia da Informação

自引率

0.00%

发文量