Calibration Capability Analysis for Digital Pressure Gauge through Measurement Audits: The Alternative to  Proficiency Testing 

Hsiu-lin Lin
{"title":"Calibration Capability Analysis for Digital Pressure Gauge through Measurement Audits: The Alternative to  Proficiency Testing ","authors":"Hsiu-lin Lin","doi":"10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Under ISO/IEC 17025, the laboratories are generally required to participate in interlaboratory comparisons or proficiency testing to maintain their high competence and assure the quality of results for establishing the effectiveness and comparability of calibrations. Participation in proficiency testing to assure the good performance and capabilities is the basic requirement for laboratories in Taiwan to apply for accreditation certification or seek an extension of the certification issued by Taiwan Accreditation Foundation (TAF), the main accreditation body in Taiwan. When the proficiency testing is not available, the calibration laboratories in Taiwan shall participate in the measurement audits under the requirement of TAF. The Center for Measurement Standards of Industrial Technology Research Institute (CMS/ITRI) not only organize the proficiency testing programs regularly but also provide the measurement audits to meet the needs of the calibration laboratories that apply for the new accreditation items. In the last two years, the tests of energy efficiency of compressed air systems were required by law, digital pressure gauge calibration services are urgently demanded in industry. In order to expand their measurement scopes to include the digital pressure gauge calibration, 11 laboratories applied for measurement audits with the CMS/ITRI since there was no proficiency testing program for digital pressure gauge calibration. In these audits, the National Measurement Laboratory (NML) provided the reference values for the digital pressure gauges. In this paper, the results of interlaboratory comparisons for 11 laboratories were analyzed based on the outcomes of the measurement audits. Through the statistical analysis, the comparison results showed reasonable agreements in general among the measurements on digital pressure gauge calibration for most of calibration laboratories. It can also be found in this analysis that the measurement audits can be used in confirming the competence of the laboratories and provide solid proof for accreditation purpose.","PeriodicalId":432978,"journal":{"name":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NCSL International Workshop & Symposium Conference Proceedings 2017","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51843/wsproceedings.2017.39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Under ISO/IEC 17025, the laboratories are generally required to participate in interlaboratory comparisons or proficiency testing to maintain their high competence and assure the quality of results for establishing the effectiveness and comparability of calibrations. Participation in proficiency testing to assure the good performance and capabilities is the basic requirement for laboratories in Taiwan to apply for accreditation certification or seek an extension of the certification issued by Taiwan Accreditation Foundation (TAF), the main accreditation body in Taiwan. When the proficiency testing is not available, the calibration laboratories in Taiwan shall participate in the measurement audits under the requirement of TAF. The Center for Measurement Standards of Industrial Technology Research Institute (CMS/ITRI) not only organize the proficiency testing programs regularly but also provide the measurement audits to meet the needs of the calibration laboratories that apply for the new accreditation items. In the last two years, the tests of energy efficiency of compressed air systems were required by law, digital pressure gauge calibration services are urgently demanded in industry. In order to expand their measurement scopes to include the digital pressure gauge calibration, 11 laboratories applied for measurement audits with the CMS/ITRI since there was no proficiency testing program for digital pressure gauge calibration. In these audits, the National Measurement Laboratory (NML) provided the reference values for the digital pressure gauges. In this paper, the results of interlaboratory comparisons for 11 laboratories were analyzed based on the outcomes of the measurement audits. Through the statistical analysis, the comparison results showed reasonable agreements in general among the measurements on digital pressure gauge calibration for most of calibration laboratories. It can also be found in this analysis that the measurement audits can be used in confirming the competence of the laboratories and provide solid proof for accreditation purpose.
通过测量审计对数字压力表的校准能力分析:能力测试的替代方案
根据ISO/IEC 17025,一般要求化验室参与实验室间比较或能力测试,以保持其高水平的能力,并确保结果的质量,以建立校准的有效性和可比性。参与能力测试以确保良好的性能和能力是台湾实验室申请认可认证或寻求台湾主要认可机构台湾认可基金会(TAF)颁发的认证延期的基本要求。当无法进行能力测试时,台湾校准实验室应根据TAF的要求参加测量审核。工业技术研究院计量标准中心除了定期组织能力测试项目外,还提供计量审核,以满足申请新认可项目的校准实验室的需求。近两年来,法律对压缩空气系统的能效测试提出了要求,工业对数字压力表校准服务的需求十分迫切。由于没有数字压力表校准的能力测试程序,11间化验室为了扩大其测量范围以包括数字压力表校准,向CMS/工研院申请测量审核。在这些审核中,国家测量实验室(NML)提供了数字压力表的参考值。在本文中,根据测量审计的结果,分析了11个实验室的实验室间比较结果。通过统计分析,比较结果表明,大多数校准实验室对数字压力表校准的测量结果基本一致。在分析中还可以发现,测量审核可以用于确认实验室的能力,并为认可目的提供可靠的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信