Research Information Management in the Context of Open Science

Katarzyna Materska
{"title":"Research Information Management in the Context of Open Science","authors":"Katarzyna Materska","doi":"10.36702/zin.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose/Thesis: The aim of this paper is to discuss the mutual relationship between open science and theory and practice in RIM (Research Information Management), especially apparent in CRISs (Current Research Information Systems), with an emphasis on the context of research assessment requirements, open science policies and CRIS interoperability.Approach/Methods: The study has been based on the critical review of the newest literature (2015–2019) presenting international studies of chosen aspects. Institution-centric and researcher-centric approaches has been presented.Results and conclusions: The emerging new ecosystem of open science changes the way research is done and modifies the monitoring and evaluating of it. CRIS must take into account the new trans­formation processes and research evaluation measures. This allows more transparency and more interaction with the individual researcher, as well as with the institutional, national and international stakeholders. Full interoperability and open standards are desired to improve the discoverability and reusability of research outputs and metadata for different purposes.Originality/Value: The study shows the significance of new tendencies in RIM/CRIS for researchers and research-performing organizations at institutional, national and international level.","PeriodicalId":176717,"journal":{"name":"Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zagadnienia Informacji Naukowej - Studia Informacyjne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36702/zin.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose/Thesis: The aim of this paper is to discuss the mutual relationship between open science and theory and practice in RIM (Research Information Management), especially apparent in CRISs (Current Research Information Systems), with an emphasis on the context of research assessment requirements, open science policies and CRIS interoperability.Approach/Methods: The study has been based on the critical review of the newest literature (2015–2019) presenting international studies of chosen aspects. Institution-centric and researcher-centric approaches has been presented.Results and conclusions: The emerging new ecosystem of open science changes the way research is done and modifies the monitoring and evaluating of it. CRIS must take into account the new trans­formation processes and research evaluation measures. This allows more transparency and more interaction with the individual researcher, as well as with the institutional, national and international stakeholders. Full interoperability and open standards are desired to improve the discoverability and reusability of research outputs and metadata for different purposes.Originality/Value: The study shows the significance of new tendencies in RIM/CRIS for researchers and research-performing organizations at institutional, national and international level.
开放科学背景下的科研信息管理
目的/论文:本文的目的是讨论开放科学与RIM(研究信息管理)理论和实践之间的相互关系,特别是在CRISs(当前研究信息系统)中,重点是研究评估要求,开放科学政策和CRIS互操作性的背景。方法/方法:本研究基于对最新文献(2015-2019)的批判性回顾,这些文献介绍了选定方面的国际研究。提出了以机构为中心和以研究人员为中心的方法。结果和结论:新兴的开放科学生态系统改变了研究的方式,并修改了对研究的监测和评估。CRIS必须考虑新的转型过程和研究评价措施。这使得研究人员个人以及机构、国家和国际利益相关者之间的互动更加透明。为了提高不同目的的研究成果和元数据的可发现性和可重用性,需要完全的互操作性和开放标准。原创性/价值:研究显示了RIM/CRIS的新趋势对机构、国家和国际层面的研究人员和研究机构的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信