Il re nascosto digitale. I media tra costruzione mediata del reale e mediazione radicale

Mario Tirino
{"title":"Il re nascosto digitale. I media tra costruzione mediata del reale e mediazione radicale","authors":"Mario Tirino","doi":"10.7413/22818138106","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Digital Hidden King. Media Among Mediatized Construction of Reality and Radical Mediation. The paper intends to explore Georg Simmel’s concept of “hidden king”, as central concept of a given era. Therefore, we analyze the concepts of “mediated construction of reality” (Couldry, Hepp 2016) and “radical mediation” (Grusin 2017), which, in our opinion, can be conceived as the “hidden king” of contemporary digital society. The massive digitization of contemporary society and culture has led to deep mediatization (Hepp, Hasebrink 2018). Therefore, digital media have helped to redefine the forms of knowledge, time and spaces of social life. In this context, Couldry and Hepp rethought the constructionism of Berger and Luckmann and the figurative sociology of Norbert Elias, in a new theoretical framework based on the centrality of the media in the construction of social symbols and collective interactions. Starting from similar bases, Richard Grusin (2015) elaborates the concept of radical mediation. Overcoming the separation between subject and object, Grusin defines mediation “as the process, action, or event that generates or provides the conditions for the emergence of subjects and objects, for the individuation of entities within the world”. Furthermore, mediation operates not by neutrally reproducing meaning or information, but “by actively transforming human and nonhuman actants, as well as their conceptual and affective states”. Mediation is thus conceived as the constitutive dimension of every relationship or contact between human and non-human actants, objects and subjects, technical media and forms of biological life. In the last part of the paper, we try to highlight the vitality of Simmel’s sociology, able to dialogue with the mediological theories of Grusin and Couldry and Hepp.","PeriodicalId":293955,"journal":{"name":"Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Im@go. A Journal of the Social Imaginary","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7413/22818138106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Digital Hidden King. Media Among Mediatized Construction of Reality and Radical Mediation. The paper intends to explore Georg Simmel’s concept of “hidden king”, as central concept of a given era. Therefore, we analyze the concepts of “mediated construction of reality” (Couldry, Hepp 2016) and “radical mediation” (Grusin 2017), which, in our opinion, can be conceived as the “hidden king” of contemporary digital society. The massive digitization of contemporary society and culture has led to deep mediatization (Hepp, Hasebrink 2018). Therefore, digital media have helped to redefine the forms of knowledge, time and spaces of social life. In this context, Couldry and Hepp rethought the constructionism of Berger and Luckmann and the figurative sociology of Norbert Elias, in a new theoretical framework based on the centrality of the media in the construction of social symbols and collective interactions. Starting from similar bases, Richard Grusin (2015) elaborates the concept of radical mediation. Overcoming the separation between subject and object, Grusin defines mediation “as the process, action, or event that generates or provides the conditions for the emergence of subjects and objects, for the individuation of entities within the world”. Furthermore, mediation operates not by neutrally reproducing meaning or information, but “by actively transforming human and nonhuman actants, as well as their conceptual and affective states”. Mediation is thus conceived as the constitutive dimension of every relationship or contact between human and non-human actants, objects and subjects, technical media and forms of biological life. In the last part of the paper, we try to highlight the vitality of Simmel’s sociology, able to dialogue with the mediological theories of Grusin and Couldry and Hepp.
数字隐藏之王。在现实的中介构建和激进的中介之间的媒介
数字隐藏之王。媒介在中介化的现实建构与激进中介中的作用。本文旨在探讨乔治·西美尔的“隐王”概念作为一个特定时代的中心概念。因此,我们分析了“现实的中介建构”(Couldry, Hepp 2016)和“激进的中介”(Grusin 2017)这两个概念,我们认为这两个概念可以被认为是当代数字社会的“隐形之王”。当代社会和文化的大规模数字化导致了深度媒体化(Hepp, Hasebrink 2018)。因此,数字媒体有助于重新定义社会生活的知识形式、时间和空间。在这一背景下,库尔德里和赫普在基于媒介在社会符号和集体互动建构中的中心地位的新理论框架中,重新思考了伯杰和卢克曼的建构主义以及诺伯特·埃利亚斯的具象社会学。Richard Grusin(2015)从类似的基础出发,阐述了激进调解的概念。格鲁辛克服了主体与客体的分离,将中介定义为“为主体和客体的出现、为世界内实体的个性化产生或提供条件的过程、行动或事件”。此外,中介不是通过中立地再现意义或信息来运作的,而是“通过积极地改变人类和非人类行为体,以及他们的概念和情感状态”。因此,调解被认为是人类和非人类行为者、客体和主体、技术媒介和生物生活形式之间的每一种关系或接触的构成维度。在文章的最后一部分,我们试图突出齐美尔的社会学的生命力,能够与格鲁辛、库尔德里和赫普的媒介学理论进行对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信