Processos Deliberativos em Políticas Sociais: Uma Análise da Efetividade Institucional de Conselhos Gestores a partir da Percepção de Seus Conselheiros

Sandro Pereira Silva
{"title":"Processos Deliberativos em Políticas Sociais: Uma Análise da Efetividade Institucional de Conselhos Gestores a partir da Percepção de Seus Conselheiros","authors":"Sandro Pereira Silva","doi":"10.5433/2176-6665.2020v25n2p427","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper sought to situate relations between the State and civil society in the current context of Brazilian democracy in terms of the emergence of new social policy themes in the governmental agenda, focusing on the mechanisms established to guarantee the socio-state interface in these areas. The perception of the members of the National Council of Food Security, the National Council for Sustainable Rural Development and the National Council of Solidarity Economy on different dimensions of its operation was analyzed in order to understand its dynamics, structure and effectiveness (internal and external). From the systematization of the answers, it was possible to trace the perceptions of these representatives about the performance, evaluation of the operation and influence of the councils addressed in the governmental decision-making structure. Results show that civil society values and strives to consolidate direct democracy mechanisms, as in the case of public policy councils. However, the deliberative character of these boards and the lack of legal instruments to ensure greater power to influence its deliberations in decision making are real obstacles that weaken the potential proposition and building innovative projects in each area in which they relate.","PeriodicalId":187793,"journal":{"name":"Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediações: Revista de Ciências Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5433/2176-6665.2020v25n2p427","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper sought to situate relations between the State and civil society in the current context of Brazilian democracy in terms of the emergence of new social policy themes in the governmental agenda, focusing on the mechanisms established to guarantee the socio-state interface in these areas. The perception of the members of the National Council of Food Security, the National Council for Sustainable Rural Development and the National Council of Solidarity Economy on different dimensions of its operation was analyzed in order to understand its dynamics, structure and effectiveness (internal and external). From the systematization of the answers, it was possible to trace the perceptions of these representatives about the performance, evaluation of the operation and influence of the councils addressed in the governmental decision-making structure. Results show that civil society values and strives to consolidate direct democracy mechanisms, as in the case of public policy councils. However, the deliberative character of these boards and the lack of legal instruments to ensure greater power to influence its deliberations in decision making are real obstacles that weaken the potential proposition and building innovative projects in each area in which they relate.
社会政策中的决策过程:从董事会成员的看法分析董事会的制度有效性
本文试图从政府议程中出现新的社会政策主题的角度,在巴西民主的当前背景下定位国家与民间社会之间的关系,重点关注为保证这些领域的社会-国家界面而建立的机制。分析了全国粮食安全委员会、全国农村可持续发展委员会和全国团结经济委员会成员对其运作的不同方面的看法,以便了解其动态、结构和有效性(内部和外部)。从答复的系统化来看,可以追溯这些代表对政府决策结构中所涉及的理事会的业绩、运作评价和影响的看法。结果表明,公民社会重视并努力巩固直接民主机制,例如公共政策委员会。然而,这些委员会的审议性质和缺乏确保在决策过程中有更大权力影响其审议的法律文书是真正的障碍,削弱了它们所涉及的每个领域的潜在提议和建立创新项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信