Liability of the Employer for Injury Caused to a Third Party in His or Her Workplace

M. Štefko
{"title":"Liability of the Employer for Injury Caused to a Third Party in His or Her Workplace","authors":"M. Štefko","doi":"10.31262/1339-5467/2022/10/3/19-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is to show, using the example of the Section 101(5) of the Czech Labour Code, that the recodification of private law has had a number of consequences, even to the point of making previously excluded constructions permissible. If the general courts originally rejected the employer’s liability for harm caused to the third parties at his/her workplaces, now, after the recodification, such liability is being imported. However, the rather complex legal regulation for a layman is still not settled in the application practice, and the courts are still looking for its optimal implementation in situations of ordinary life. Thus, despite a more favourable regulation for him/her, the injured party may still lose in the implementation of his/her right, if he/she incorrectly estimates the legal position of the responsible entity.","PeriodicalId":406988,"journal":{"name":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societas et Iurisprudentia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31262/1339-5467/2022/10/3/19-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to show, using the example of the Section 101(5) of the Czech Labour Code, that the recodification of private law has had a number of consequences, even to the point of making previously excluded constructions permissible. If the general courts originally rejected the employer’s liability for harm caused to the third parties at his/her workplaces, now, after the recodification, such liability is being imported. However, the rather complex legal regulation for a layman is still not settled in the application practice, and the courts are still looking for its optimal implementation in situations of ordinary life. Thus, despite a more favourable regulation for him/her, the injured party may still lose in the implementation of his/her right, if he/she incorrectly estimates the legal position of the responsible entity.
雇主在其工作场所对第三方造成伤害的责任
本文旨在以《捷克劳动法》第101(5)条为例说明,私法的重新合法化产生了一系列后果,甚至达到了允许以前被排除的结构的程度。如果普通法院最初驳回了雇主在其工作场所对第三方造成损害的责任,那么现在,在重新认可之后,这种责任正在被引入。然而,对于外行来说相当复杂的法律规制在适用实践中仍未得到解决,法院仍在寻找其在日常生活情境中的最佳实施。因此,即使有更有利于他/她的规定,如果他/她错误地估计责任实体的法律地位,他/她在行使自己的权利时仍然可能会失败。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信