NTC vs IEC: Comparative analysis between the lightning protection standards: NTC 4552 and IEC 62305, using a practical Example

H. Ortega
{"title":"NTC vs IEC: Comparative analysis between the lightning protection standards: NTC 4552 and IEC 62305, using a practical Example","authors":"H. Ortega","doi":"10.1109/ANDESCON.2014.7098552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary form only given: Colombia is located in the Intertropical Confluence Zone where a significant lightning activity is observed. Therefore, it is extremely important to select the Integral Protection System Lightning SIPRA increases the chances of ensuring effective protection against lightning. Not only because it is in between the security of being human, also of other living beings, but their impact on infrastructure and electrical and electronic equipment. The current situation in Colombia on the choice of methodology for the lightning risk assessment is supported by national and international regulations and standards binding. The Technical Regulations for Electrical Installations RETIE force since 2006 requires the use of standards or NTC 4552 IEC 62305, enabling the application of other rules of international recognition. Essentially the silver methodologies in standards IEC 62305 and NTC4552 are similar. However, when the results are decisive differences are observed. This paper aims to present the most representative differences between the developments raised on lightning protection set forth in IEC 62305 and 4552 standards NTC, through a comparative analysis of these standards through its application in a case study. To perform this analysis engineering design where the lightning risk is analyzed in a building that houses equipment distribution, protection and control of a power system that feeds into a petrochemical process loads the standard NTC 4552 and located in the chosen building in the city of Barrancabermeja, Santander. Using these rules in the same case study, comparing and evaluating its results are expected to provide tools to determine the most appropriate standard to apply in Colombia.","PeriodicalId":123628,"journal":{"name":"2014 IEEE ANDESCON","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 IEEE ANDESCON","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ANDESCON.2014.7098552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary form only given: Colombia is located in the Intertropical Confluence Zone where a significant lightning activity is observed. Therefore, it is extremely important to select the Integral Protection System Lightning SIPRA increases the chances of ensuring effective protection against lightning. Not only because it is in between the security of being human, also of other living beings, but their impact on infrastructure and electrical and electronic equipment. The current situation in Colombia on the choice of methodology for the lightning risk assessment is supported by national and international regulations and standards binding. The Technical Regulations for Electrical Installations RETIE force since 2006 requires the use of standards or NTC 4552 IEC 62305, enabling the application of other rules of international recognition. Essentially the silver methodologies in standards IEC 62305 and NTC4552 are similar. However, when the results are decisive differences are observed. This paper aims to present the most representative differences between the developments raised on lightning protection set forth in IEC 62305 and 4552 standards NTC, through a comparative analysis of these standards through its application in a case study. To perform this analysis engineering design where the lightning risk is analyzed in a building that houses equipment distribution, protection and control of a power system that feeds into a petrochemical process loads the standard NTC 4552 and located in the chosen building in the city of Barrancabermeja, Santander. Using these rules in the same case study, comparing and evaluating its results are expected to provide tools to determine the most appropriate standard to apply in Colombia.
NTC与IEC:雷电防护标准NTC 4552和IEC 62305的比较分析,用一个实际的例子
仅提供摘要格式:哥伦比亚位于热带合流区,在那里观测到明显的闪电活动。因此,它是极其重要的选择整体保护系统雷电SIPRA增加机会,确保有效地防止闪电。不仅因为它涉及到人类和其他生物的安全,还因为它对基础设施和电子电气设备的影响。哥伦比亚目前关于闪电风险评估方法选择的情况得到了具有约束力的国家和国际条例和标准的支持。自2006年以来,电气装置技术法规RETIE强制要求使用NTC 4552或IEC 62305标准,从而能够应用其他国际认可的规则。基本上,IEC 62305和NTC4552标准中的银方法是相似的。然而,当结果是决定性的差异观察。本文旨在通过一个案例研究,对IEC 62305和NTC 4552标准中提出的防雷发展进行比较分析,从而展示它们之间最具代表性的差异。为了执行这个分析工程设计,在一个建筑物中分析雷电风险,该建筑物容纳设备配电,电力系统的保护和控制,该电力系统输入到石化过程中,加载标准NTC 4552,位于桑坦德市Barrancabermeja的选定建筑物中。在同一案例研究中使用这些规则,比较和评价其结果,预计将为确定在哥伦比亚适用的最适当标准提供工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信