DE-RADICALIZATION AND GUIDANCE FOR CRIMINAL ACTS OF TERRORISM IN INDONESIA

Dewa Ayu Putu Utari Praba
{"title":"DE-RADICALIZATION AND GUIDANCE FOR CRIMINAL ACTS OF TERRORISM IN INDONESIA","authors":"Dewa Ayu Putu Utari Praba","doi":"10.23887/glr.v2i1.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \nDeradicalization is an effort to reduce radical activities and neutralize radical understanding for someone who is involved with terrorists and their sympathizers and community members who are exposed to radical terrorist understandings. These efforts to transform from radical beliefs or ideologies to non-radical ones with multi and interdisciplinary approaches for people who are affected by radical beliefs. However, in this case the de-radicalization program against terrorism has not been effective due to several things such as the non-optimal implementation of existing development standards, community culture that is sometimes still relatively difficult to accept ex- terrorists after they leave prison, as well as non-cooperative prisoners. In this case, the handling of Terrorism Crimes committed by the government can be divided into two fields, inside the Penitentiary and outside the Penitentiary. The legal approach method based on Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning Eradication of Terrorism Crimes has not optimally reduced the potential for violence against acts of terrorism because it tends to display the use of weapons. This research was conducted using an empirical legal research method that combines descriptive qualitative and quantitative methods. The nature of this research is descriptive research (describing) analysis. With the efforts to deradicalize and foster terrorism, it is hoped that there will be cooperation between terrorist prisoners and the government to provide information on the existence of the terrorism network. \n \n \n","PeriodicalId":399663,"journal":{"name":"Ganesha Law Review","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ganesha Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23887/glr.v2i1.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Deradicalization is an effort to reduce radical activities and neutralize radical understanding for someone who is involved with terrorists and their sympathizers and community members who are exposed to radical terrorist understandings. These efforts to transform from radical beliefs or ideologies to non-radical ones with multi and interdisciplinary approaches for people who are affected by radical beliefs. However, in this case the de-radicalization program against terrorism has not been effective due to several things such as the non-optimal implementation of existing development standards, community culture that is sometimes still relatively difficult to accept ex- terrorists after they leave prison, as well as non-cooperative prisoners. In this case, the handling of Terrorism Crimes committed by the government can be divided into two fields, inside the Penitentiary and outside the Penitentiary. The legal approach method based on Law Number 15 of 2003 concerning Eradication of Terrorism Crimes has not optimally reduced the potential for violence against acts of terrorism because it tends to display the use of weapons. This research was conducted using an empirical legal research method that combines descriptive qualitative and quantitative methods. The nature of this research is descriptive research (describing) analysis. With the efforts to deradicalize and foster terrorism, it is hoped that there will be cooperation between terrorist prisoners and the government to provide information on the existence of the terrorism network.
印度尼西亚去极端化和指导恐怖主义犯罪行为
去极端化是一种努力,旨在减少激进活动,中和那些与恐怖分子及其同情者和社区成员有关的人的激进理解,这些人暴露于激进的恐怖主义理解。这些努力是从激进的信仰或意识形态向非激进的转变,为受激进信仰影响的人提供多学科的方法。然而,在这种情况下,由于现有的发展标准没有得到最佳的实施,社区文化有时仍然相对难以接受前恐怖分子离开监狱,以及不合作的囚犯,反恐去激进化计划并没有取得成效。在这种情况下,政府对恐怖主义犯罪的处理可以分为监狱内和监狱外两个领域。基于2003年关于根除恐怖主义罪行的第15号法律的法律方法并没有最佳地减少针对恐怖主义行为的暴力可能性,因为它往往显示使用武器。本研究采用描述性定性与定量相结合的实证法律研究方法。本研究的性质是描述性研究(描述)分析。在努力使恐怖主义去极端化和扶植恐怖主义的同时,希望恐怖分子囚犯与政府合作,提供有关恐怖主义网络存在的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信