In Favor of Clear Thinking: Incorporating Moral Rules into a Wise Cost-Benefit Analysis

M. Bazerman, Joshua D. Greene
{"title":"In Favor of Clear Thinking: Incorporating Moral Rules into a Wise Cost-Benefit Analysis","authors":"M. Bazerman, Joshua D. Greene","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1431982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bennis, Medin, and Bartels (2009) have contributed an interesting paper on the comparative benefit of moral rules versus cost-benefit analysis. Many of their specific comments are accurate, useful, and insightful. At the same time, we believe they have misrepresented cost-benefit analysis and have reached a set of conclusions that are misguided and, if adopted wholesale, potentially dangerous. Overall, they offer wise suggestions for making CBA more effective, rather than eliminating CBA as a decision-making tool.","PeriodicalId":269123,"journal":{"name":"Justice & Negotiations","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justice & Negotiations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1431982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Bennis, Medin, and Bartels (2009) have contributed an interesting paper on the comparative benefit of moral rules versus cost-benefit analysis. Many of their specific comments are accurate, useful, and insightful. At the same time, we believe they have misrepresented cost-benefit analysis and have reached a set of conclusions that are misguided and, if adopted wholesale, potentially dangerous. Overall, they offer wise suggestions for making CBA more effective, rather than eliminating CBA as a decision-making tool.
支持清晰的思维:将道德规则纳入明智的成本-收益分析
Bennis, Medin和Bartels(2009)发表了一篇关于道德规则与成本效益分析的比较效益的有趣论文。他们的许多具体评论都是准确的、有用的和有见地的。与此同时,我们认为他们歪曲了成本效益分析,并得出了一系列被误导的结论,如果全部采用,可能会带来危险。总的来说,他们为提高CBA的效率提出了明智的建议,而不是取消CBA作为决策工具的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信