Enhancing Fairness in Performance Appraisals: A Conceptual Framework Through a Systematic Literature Review

Agustinus Tarigan, Aurik Gustomo, Yuni Ros Bangun
{"title":"Enhancing Fairness in Performance Appraisals: A Conceptual Framework Through a Systematic Literature Review","authors":"Agustinus Tarigan, Aurik Gustomo, Yuni Ros Bangun","doi":"10.56868/jadhur.v2i3.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to comprehensively explore the multifaceted landscape of performance appraisals and, consequently, construct a coherent conceptual framework that augments the fairness and effectiveness of performance evaluation processes. The research design employs a meticulous, systematic literature review, drawing from 42 carefully selected articles from Scopus. This methodology facilitates in-depth analysis of diverse variables and dimensions associated with performance appraisals, particularly concerning the design of appraisal systems, the psychological elements at play, and the often-overlooked political influences. Within this intricate interplay, the study endeavors to unearth insights into the intricate mechanisms that govern the goal-setting process and the subsequent execution of performance appraisals within the dynamic public sector. Through an analytical lens, this study's findings enrich the development of a conceptual framework that transcends theoretical boundaries, finding practical resonance within the realm of performance appraisals. This framework, fortified by a holistic understanding of key dimensions and influential factors contributing to subjective bias, is a powerful instrument for unraveling and addressing fairness concerns inherent in performance appraisal practices. Ultimately, the framework presents a systematic trajectory for heightening the efficacy of performance appraisal design and execution, all underpinned by the overarching objectives of nurturing an environment of acceptable fairness.","PeriodicalId":248834,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Humanities Research","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Humanities Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56868/jadhur.v2i3.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively explore the multifaceted landscape of performance appraisals and, consequently, construct a coherent conceptual framework that augments the fairness and effectiveness of performance evaluation processes. The research design employs a meticulous, systematic literature review, drawing from 42 carefully selected articles from Scopus. This methodology facilitates in-depth analysis of diverse variables and dimensions associated with performance appraisals, particularly concerning the design of appraisal systems, the psychological elements at play, and the often-overlooked political influences. Within this intricate interplay, the study endeavors to unearth insights into the intricate mechanisms that govern the goal-setting process and the subsequent execution of performance appraisals within the dynamic public sector. Through an analytical lens, this study's findings enrich the development of a conceptual framework that transcends theoretical boundaries, finding practical resonance within the realm of performance appraisals. This framework, fortified by a holistic understanding of key dimensions and influential factors contributing to subjective bias, is a powerful instrument for unraveling and addressing fairness concerns inherent in performance appraisal practices. Ultimately, the framework presents a systematic trajectory for heightening the efficacy of performance appraisal design and execution, all underpinned by the overarching objectives of nurturing an environment of acceptable fairness.
通过系统的文献回顾,提高绩效评估的公平性:一个概念框架
本研究旨在全面探讨绩效评估的多面性,从而构建一个连贯的概念框架,以增强绩效评估过程的公平性和有效性。研究设计采用了细致、系统的文献综述,从Scopus中精心挑选了42篇文章。这种方法有助于深入分析与考绩有关的各种变量和方面,特别是关于考绩制度的设计、起作用的心理因素和经常被忽视的政治影响。在这种错综复杂的相互作用中,本研究努力发掘在动态的公共部门中管理目标设定过程和随后执行绩效评估的复杂机制的见解。通过分析的视角,本研究的发现丰富了超越理论界限的概念框架的发展,在绩效评估领域找到了实际的共鸣。这个框架,通过对导致主观偏见的关键维度和影响因素的整体理解而得到加强,是揭示和解决绩效评估实践中固有的公平问题的有力工具。最后,该框架提出了一个提高考绩设计和执行效率的系统轨迹,所有这些都以培育可接受的公平环境这一总体目标为基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信