Resilience, reliability and gas to power systems in the USA: an energy policy outlook in the era of decarbonization

T. Oyewunmi
{"title":"Resilience, reliability and gas to power systems in the USA: an energy policy outlook in the era of decarbonization","authors":"T. Oyewunmi","doi":"10.1093/jwelb/jwab022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article examines the requirements of resilience and reliability for gas to power systems planning in an era of decarbonization. It recongizes that energy transitions and decarbonization portend an increasing competition between various traditional and emerging net-zero, carbon neutral and low-carbon energy sources and technologies. Likewise, energy policy development has traditionally focused on the dimensions of affordability, sustainability, cost-efficiency through viable markets and security of supply. Recent disruptive events that may or may not be attributable to climate change have tested the resiliency of energy networks. Thus, energy policy and planning now require a more comprehensive outlook that includes the dimension of resilience. Also, there is the need to prevent or effectively manage the aftermath of disruptive events, rather than a piecemeal focus on hardening infrastructure against one or more issues such as cyber-security and functionality of energy networks in adverse conditions. This article discusses resilience and reliability as key dimensions of US energy policy from a public choice law and economics purview. It builds on the premise that politicians, administrative agencies and other stakeholders in the energy sector can be irrational and therefore unable to identify and implement the policy package that is in the public interest if not properly guided. It considers the role of investments in resilience and systems planning. It also underscores the need for developing a more efficient framework that would enable relevant stakeholders to avoid the risk of opportunity cost neglect, informational gaps and fragmented institutional coordination that could escalate the social, health, safety and economic impacts of future disruptive events such as the February 2021 winter storm Uri that tested the resilience of energy supply infrastructure in the US.","PeriodicalId":427865,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of World Energy Law & Business","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of World Energy Law & Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jwelb/jwab022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

This article examines the requirements of resilience and reliability for gas to power systems planning in an era of decarbonization. It recongizes that energy transitions and decarbonization portend an increasing competition between various traditional and emerging net-zero, carbon neutral and low-carbon energy sources and technologies. Likewise, energy policy development has traditionally focused on the dimensions of affordability, sustainability, cost-efficiency through viable markets and security of supply. Recent disruptive events that may or may not be attributable to climate change have tested the resiliency of energy networks. Thus, energy policy and planning now require a more comprehensive outlook that includes the dimension of resilience. Also, there is the need to prevent or effectively manage the aftermath of disruptive events, rather than a piecemeal focus on hardening infrastructure against one or more issues such as cyber-security and functionality of energy networks in adverse conditions. This article discusses resilience and reliability as key dimensions of US energy policy from a public choice law and economics purview. It builds on the premise that politicians, administrative agencies and other stakeholders in the energy sector can be irrational and therefore unable to identify and implement the policy package that is in the public interest if not properly guided. It considers the role of investments in resilience and systems planning. It also underscores the need for developing a more efficient framework that would enable relevant stakeholders to avoid the risk of opportunity cost neglect, informational gaps and fragmented institutional coordination that could escalate the social, health, safety and economic impacts of future disruptive events such as the February 2021 winter storm Uri that tested the resilience of energy supply infrastructure in the US.
美国的弹性、可靠性和天然气到电力系统:脱碳时代的能源政策展望
本文探讨了脱碳时代对燃气发电系统规划弹性和可靠性的要求。它认识到,能源转型和脱碳预示着各种传统和新兴的净零、碳中和和低碳能源和技术之间的竞争日益激烈。同样,能源政策的制定传统上侧重于可负担性、可持续性、通过可行的市场和供应安全的成本效益等方面。最近的破坏性事件可能归因于气候变化,也可能不归因于气候变化,这些事件考验了能源网络的弹性。因此,能源政策和规划现在需要一个更全面的前景,包括弹性的维度。此外,还需要预防或有效管理破坏性事件的后果,而不是零敲碎打地专注于加强基础设施,以应对一个或多个问题,如网络安全和能源网络在不利条件下的功能。本文从公共选择法和经济学的角度讨论了弹性和可靠性作为美国能源政策的关键维度。它建立在一个前提之上,即政治家、行政机构和能源部门的其他利益相关者可能是非理性的,因此如果没有适当的指导,就无法确定和实施符合公众利益的一揽子政策。它考虑了在弹性和系统规划方面投资的作用。报告还强调,有必要制定一个更有效的框架,使相关利益攸关方能够避免机会成本被忽视、信息差距和分散的机构协调的风险,这些风险可能会加剧未来破坏性事件(如2021年2月考验美国能源供应基础设施弹性的冬季风暴Uri)对社会、健康、安全和经济的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信