Aggregate interference with FCC and ECC white space usage rules: Case study in Finland

R. Jantti, Jussi Kerttula, K. Koufos, K. Ruttik
{"title":"Aggregate interference with FCC and ECC white space usage rules: Case study in Finland","authors":"R. Jantti, Jussi Kerttula, K. Koufos, K. Ruttik","doi":"10.1109/DYSPAN.2011.5936252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In US FCC and in Europe ECC have outlined the rules for TV-band secondary use. In this paper we apply those rules and compute how much white space is available in Finland. The results are expressed in terms of available secondary channels and secondary system capacity. As a secondary system we use cellular networks with different cell sizes. Unfortunately, the current secondary spectrum usage rules do not protect the TV receivers sufficiently well. Even if each individual secondary transmitter obey them, together their aggregate interference can still disrupt the TV reception. We compute how much aggregate interference a secondary network generates if the network is designed either by FCC or ECC rules. We discover that only for a low secondary transmitters' density, the TV reception will not be disturbed. We can conclude that current white space usage rules are not adequate for protecting the TV receivers. There is a need to develop constraints that consider not only secondary transmission powers but also transmitters' density.","PeriodicalId":119856,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"39","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DYSPAN.2011.5936252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 39

Abstract

In US FCC and in Europe ECC have outlined the rules for TV-band secondary use. In this paper we apply those rules and compute how much white space is available in Finland. The results are expressed in terms of available secondary channels and secondary system capacity. As a secondary system we use cellular networks with different cell sizes. Unfortunately, the current secondary spectrum usage rules do not protect the TV receivers sufficiently well. Even if each individual secondary transmitter obey them, together their aggregate interference can still disrupt the TV reception. We compute how much aggregate interference a secondary network generates if the network is designed either by FCC or ECC rules. We discover that only for a low secondary transmitters' density, the TV reception will not be disturbed. We can conclude that current white space usage rules are not adequate for protecting the TV receivers. There is a need to develop constraints that consider not only secondary transmission powers but also transmitters' density.
对FCC和ECC空白空间使用规则的聚合干扰:芬兰的案例研究
在美国FCC和欧洲ECC已经概述了电视频段二次使用的规则。在本文中,我们应用这些规则并计算芬兰可用的空白空间。结果用可用的辅助信道和辅助系统容量来表示。作为二级系统,我们使用不同单元大小的蜂窝网络。不幸的是,目前的二次频谱使用规则不能很好地保护电视接收器。即使每个单独的次级发射机都服从它们,它们的综合干扰仍然会干扰电视接收。如果网络是按照FCC或ECC规则设计的,我们计算二级网络产生的总干扰。我们发现,只有在较低的二次发射机密度下,电视接收才不会受到干扰。我们可以得出结论,目前的空白空间使用规则不足以保护电视接收器。有必要制定约束,不仅要考虑二次传输功率,还要考虑发射机的密度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信