Runout Number: A New Metric for Landslide Runout Characterization

Cory S. Wallace, P. Santi
{"title":"Runout Number: A New Metric for Landslide Runout Characterization","authors":"Cory S. Wallace, P. Santi","doi":"10.2113/eeg-d-20-00144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Landslide runout has traditionally been quantified by the height-to-length ratio, H/L, which, in many cases, is strongly influenced by the slope of the runout path. In this study, we propose an alternative mobility measure, the unitless Runout Number, measured as the landslide length divided by the square root of the landslide area, which characterizes landslide shape in terms of elongation. We used a database of 158 landslides of varying runout distances from locations in northern California, Oregon, and Washington state to compare the two runout measurement methods and explore their predictability using parameters that can be measured or estimated using geographic information systems. The Runout Number better describes the overall runout for several landslide and slope geometries. The two mobility measures show very little correlation to each other, indicating that the two parameters describe different landslide mobility mechanisms. When compared to predictive parameters shown by prior research to relate to landslide runout, the two runout measurement methods show different correlations. H/L correlates more strongly to initial slope angle, upslope contributing area, landslide area, and grain size distribution (percent clay, silt, total fines, and sand). The Runout Number correlates more strongly to planimetric curvature, upslope contributing area normalized by landslide area, and percent sand. Although these correlations are not necessarily strong enough for prediction, they indicate the validity of both runout measurement methods and the benefit of including both numbers when characterizing landslide mobility.","PeriodicalId":138906,"journal":{"name":"Environmental and Engineering Geoscience","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental and Engineering Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2113/eeg-d-20-00144","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Landslide runout has traditionally been quantified by the height-to-length ratio, H/L, which, in many cases, is strongly influenced by the slope of the runout path. In this study, we propose an alternative mobility measure, the unitless Runout Number, measured as the landslide length divided by the square root of the landslide area, which characterizes landslide shape in terms of elongation. We used a database of 158 landslides of varying runout distances from locations in northern California, Oregon, and Washington state to compare the two runout measurement methods and explore their predictability using parameters that can be measured or estimated using geographic information systems. The Runout Number better describes the overall runout for several landslide and slope geometries. The two mobility measures show very little correlation to each other, indicating that the two parameters describe different landslide mobility mechanisms. When compared to predictive parameters shown by prior research to relate to landslide runout, the two runout measurement methods show different correlations. H/L correlates more strongly to initial slope angle, upslope contributing area, landslide area, and grain size distribution (percent clay, silt, total fines, and sand). The Runout Number correlates more strongly to planimetric curvature, upslope contributing area normalized by landslide area, and percent sand. Although these correlations are not necessarily strong enough for prediction, they indicate the validity of both runout measurement methods and the benefit of including both numbers when characterizing landslide mobility.
跳动数:滑坡跳动表征的新度量
滑坡跳动传统上是用高长比H/L来量化的,在许多情况下,它受到跳动路径坡度的强烈影响。在这项研究中,我们提出了一种替代的流动性测量方法,即无单位跳动数,用滑坡长度除以滑坡面积的平方根来测量,它在伸长方面表征了滑坡的形状。我们使用了来自北加州、俄勒冈州和华盛顿州的158个不同跳动距离的滑坡数据库来比较两种跳动测量方法,并利用地理信息系统可以测量或估计的参数来探索它们的可预测性。跳动数更好地描述了几种滑坡和斜坡几何形状的总体跳动。两种迁移量指标之间的相关性很小,说明两种参数描述了不同的滑坡迁移机制。对比前人研究中与滑坡跳动相关的预测参数,两种跳动测量方法表现出不同的相关性。H/L与初始坡角、上坡贡献面积、滑坡面积和粒度分布(粘土、粉砂、总细粒和砂的百分比)的相关性更强。跳动数与平面曲率、滑坡面积归一化的上坡贡献面积和沙粒百分比相关性更强。虽然这些相关性并不一定足以预测,但它们表明了跳动测量方法的有效性以及在表征滑坡流动性时包括这两个数字的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信