Automated Driving System, Male, or Female Driver: Who'd You Prefer? Comparative Analysis of Passengers' Mental Conditions, Emotional States & Qualitative Feedback

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications Pub Date : 2016-10-24 DOI:10.1145/3003715.3005410

Philipp Wintersberger, A. Riener, Anna-Katharina Frison

{"title":"Automated Driving System, Male, or Female Driver: Who'd You Prefer? Comparative Analysis of Passengers' Mental Conditions, Emotional States & Qualitative Feedback","authors":"Philipp Wintersberger, A. Riener, Anna-Katharina Frison","doi":"10.1145/3003715.3005410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is expected that automated vehicles (AVs) will only be used when customers believe them to be safe, trustworthy, and match their personal driving style. As AVs are not very common today, most previous studies on trust, user experience, or acceptance measures in automated driving are based on qualitative measures. The approach followed in this work is different, as we compared the direct effect of human drivers versus automated driving systems (ADSs) on the front seat passenger. In a driving simulator study (N=48), subjects had either to ride with an ADS, a male, or a female driver. Driving scenarios were the same for all subjects. Findings from quantitative measurements (HRV, face tracking) and qualitative pre-/post study surveys and interviews suggest that there are no significant differences between the passenger groups. Our conclusion is, that passengers are already inclined to accept ADS and that the market is ready for AVs.","PeriodicalId":448266,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","volume":"247 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3003715.3005410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 55

Abstract

It is expected that automated vehicles (AVs) will only be used when customers believe them to be safe, trustworthy, and match their personal driving style. As AVs are not very common today, most previous studies on trust, user experience, or acceptance measures in automated driving are based on qualitative measures. The approach followed in this work is different, as we compared the direct effect of human drivers versus automated driving systems (ADSs) on the front seat passenger. In a driving simulator study (N=48), subjects had either to ride with an ADS, a male, or a female driver. Driving scenarios were the same for all subjects. Findings from quantitative measurements (HRV, face tracking) and qualitative pre-/post study surveys and interviews suggest that there are no significant differences between the passenger groups. Our conclusion is, that passengers are already inclined to accept ADS and that the market is ready for AVs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

自动驾驶系统，男司机还是女司机:你更喜欢谁?乘客心理状态、情绪状态对比分析及定性反馈

预计自动驾驶汽车(AVs)只会在客户认为它们安全、值得信赖并符合其个人驾驶风格的情况下使用。由于自动驾驶汽车在今天还不是很普遍，所以之前大多数关于自动驾驶信任、用户体验或接受度的研究都是基于定性的测量。本研究采用的方法有所不同，因为我们比较了人类驾驶员与自动驾驶系统(ads)对前座乘客的直接影响。在驾驶模拟器研究(N=48)中，受试者要么与ADS驾驶员、男性驾驶员或女性驾驶员一起驾驶。所有受试者的驾驶场景都是一样的。定量测量(HRV，面部跟踪)和定性研究前/后调查和访谈的结果表明，乘客群体之间没有显著差异。我们的结论是，乘客已经倾向于接受ADS，市场已经为自动驾驶做好了准备。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications

自引率

0.00%

发文量