List of Figures, Tables and Plates

J. Johnston
{"title":"List of Figures, Tables and Plates","authors":"J. Johnston","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt183p451.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This thesis examines how democratically described new and revolutionary ideas came to be elucidated in the resource and environmental management framework provided within the Resource Management Act, 1991, and considers how they are given effect in current planning practice. The research focuses on consultation which seeks to resolve environmental disputes not only to achieve sustainable environment outcomes in an ecological sense, but also to give greater expression to democratic principles. This research undertaking is in response to a continually reiterated need to evaluate the effectiveness of planning practice in achieving its aims, together with a necessity to then take appropriate responses to the results of the evaluation, for instance as found within the Resource Management Law Reform reports of the 1980's, in planning publications, as well as in the Resource Management Act, 1991 , itself. This thesis identifies the principles and objectives intended and anticipated to be realized through public participatory planning and environmental dispute resolution processes. It provides a theoretical framework for consideration of consultation and environmental dispute resolution processes, as it explores theory informing the characteristics of environmental disputes, and also the different types of consultation process able to be utilized for dispute resolution. The efficacy of resource and environmental management in achieving the principles underpinning, and objectives of, public participation in EDR processes is evaluated by consideration of participant perspectives of consultation processes. This research identifies and analyzes the benefits and strengths, problems and limitations experienced by participants in a variety of EDR processes that were employed to resolve a particular dispute the 'Fitzherbert Avenue cross river transportation dispute' in Palmerston North, as a case study. An analysis between expectations and experience is extrapolated into an indicator of whether these EDR processes are achieving the RMA's intentions, in terms of the principles and objectives which necessitate public consultation. This research also provides some explanation for the experiences of participants, thereby indicating how and why the underlying principles and objectives are or are not being met. The research conclusions address the question, 'how well were the principles and objectives of consultation, within the context of the RMA, given effect or realised in practice?'. In drawing conclusions this thesis explores the uniqueness of a case study, but also identifies RMA implementation issues of more general relevance and interest. Analysis of generic RMA implementation issues describes consistent themes that indicate more needs to be done to effectively achieve the objectives of the RMA, as there are concerns about the abilities of planning practice and those responsible for implementing the Act to realise all its intentions. Concerns of relevance to consultation processes are discussed and suggestions for improving practical implementation of the RMA are made.","PeriodicalId":424985,"journal":{"name":"The Neolithic Lithic Industry at Tell Ain El-Kerkh","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Neolithic Lithic Industry at Tell Ain El-Kerkh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt183p451.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This thesis examines how democratically described new and revolutionary ideas came to be elucidated in the resource and environmental management framework provided within the Resource Management Act, 1991, and considers how they are given effect in current planning practice. The research focuses on consultation which seeks to resolve environmental disputes not only to achieve sustainable environment outcomes in an ecological sense, but also to give greater expression to democratic principles. This research undertaking is in response to a continually reiterated need to evaluate the effectiveness of planning practice in achieving its aims, together with a necessity to then take appropriate responses to the results of the evaluation, for instance as found within the Resource Management Law Reform reports of the 1980's, in planning publications, as well as in the Resource Management Act, 1991 , itself. This thesis identifies the principles and objectives intended and anticipated to be realized through public participatory planning and environmental dispute resolution processes. It provides a theoretical framework for consideration of consultation and environmental dispute resolution processes, as it explores theory informing the characteristics of environmental disputes, and also the different types of consultation process able to be utilized for dispute resolution. The efficacy of resource and environmental management in achieving the principles underpinning, and objectives of, public participation in EDR processes is evaluated by consideration of participant perspectives of consultation processes. This research identifies and analyzes the benefits and strengths, problems and limitations experienced by participants in a variety of EDR processes that were employed to resolve a particular dispute the 'Fitzherbert Avenue cross river transportation dispute' in Palmerston North, as a case study. An analysis between expectations and experience is extrapolated into an indicator of whether these EDR processes are achieving the RMA's intentions, in terms of the principles and objectives which necessitate public consultation. This research also provides some explanation for the experiences of participants, thereby indicating how and why the underlying principles and objectives are or are not being met. The research conclusions address the question, 'how well were the principles and objectives of consultation, within the context of the RMA, given effect or realised in practice?'. In drawing conclusions this thesis explores the uniqueness of a case study, but also identifies RMA implementation issues of more general relevance and interest. Analysis of generic RMA implementation issues describes consistent themes that indicate more needs to be done to effectively achieve the objectives of the RMA, as there are concerns about the abilities of planning practice and those responsible for implementing the Act to realise all its intentions. Concerns of relevance to consultation processes are discussed and suggestions for improving practical implementation of the RMA are made.
图,表和板的列表
本文考察了1991年《资源管理法》提供的资源和环境管理框架中如何民主地描述了新的和革命性的思想,并考虑了它们如何在当前的规划实践中发挥作用。研究的重点是协商,协商旨在解决环境争端,不仅要在生态意义上实现可持续的环境结果,而且要更多地表达民主原则。这项研究工作是为了回应不断重申的需要,即评价规划实践在实现其目标方面的有效性,同时也有必要对评价结果作出适当反应,例如1980年代《资源管理法改革》报告、规划出版物以及1991年《资源管理法》本身所载的结果。本论文确定了通过公众参与式规划和环境争议解决过程预期实现的原则和目标。它为考虑协商和环境争议解决过程提供了一个理论框架,因为它探索了告知环境争议特征的理论,以及能够用于争议解决的不同类型的协商过程。资源和环境管理在实现公众参与环境研究过程的原则和目标方面的效力,是通过考虑协商过程的参与者的观点来评价的。本研究确定并分析了参与者在各种EDR过程中所经历的好处和优势,问题和局限性,这些过程被用来解决一个特定的争议,即北帕默斯顿的“菲茨赫伯特大道跨河运输争议”,作为案例研究。根据需要征求公众意见的原则和目标,将期望和经验之间的分析外推为这些EDR过程是否实现军事革命意图的指标。这项研究也为参与者的经历提供了一些解释,从而表明了如何以及为什么基本原则和目标没有得到满足。研究结论解决了这样一个问题:“在军事革命的背景下,咨询的原则和目标在实践中发挥了多大的作用或实现了多大的作用?”在得出结论时,本文探讨了案例研究的独特性,但也确定了更普遍相关和感兴趣的军事革命实施问题。对一般军事革命实施问题的分析描述了一致的主题,表明需要做更多的工作来有效地实现军事革命的目标,因为人们担心规划实践的能力和负责实施法案的人实现其所有意图。讨论了与协商进程有关的问题,并提出了改进军事革命实际实施的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信