Whither Quistclose trusts? A non-linear development of the doctrine

A. Leung, Samuel Yee Ching Leung
{"title":"Whither Quistclose trusts? A non-linear development of the doctrine","authors":"A. Leung, Samuel Yee Ching Leung","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttac120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The term “Quistclose trust” requires little introduction. Prickly Bay Waterside Ltd v British American Insurance Co Ltd [2022] UKPC 8 appears to be another Quistclose trust case adding to the wealth of authority on this subject—but is it? Apart from distilling the previous authorities, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council seems to have set down other signposts to guide the courts. This article discusses the development of the Quistclose doctrine brought by this Privy Council decision. In particular, it will explore the purported refinement of the test of Quistclose trust, the relevant intention to be proven under the test, the issues in relation to fiduciary duty in this context, and also the way forward.","PeriodicalId":171463,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttac120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The term “Quistclose trust” requires little introduction. Prickly Bay Waterside Ltd v British American Insurance Co Ltd [2022] UKPC 8 appears to be another Quistclose trust case adding to the wealth of authority on this subject—but is it? Apart from distilling the previous authorities, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council seems to have set down other signposts to guide the courts. This article discusses the development of the Quistclose doctrine brought by this Privy Council decision. In particular, it will explore the purported refinement of the test of Quistclose trust, the relevant intention to be proven under the test, the issues in relation to fiduciary duty in this context, and also the way forward.
奎斯特克洛斯相信什么?学说的非线性发展
“奎斯特克洛斯信托”一词无需介绍。刺湾水边有限公司诉英美保险有限公司[2022]UKPC 8似乎是另一个奎斯特克洛斯信托案件,增加了在这个问题上的权威财富——但这是吗?枢密院的司法委员会除了提炼以前的权威之外,似乎还设立了其他路标来指导法院。本文讨论了枢密院这一决定所带来的奎斯特克洛斯学说的发展。特别地,本文将探讨questclose信托测试的所谓改进,在测试下需要证明的相关意图,在这种情况下与信义义务相关的问题,以及未来的发展方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信