{"title":"Prospects of development of the Russian innovative system through the prism of qualitative methods","authors":"V. Volchik, E. Fursa, A. Maskaev","doi":"10.21202/2782-2923.2021.4.641-660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to examine the influence of positive and critical narratives in the media, illustrating the problems and strengths of the Russian innovation system development, on the formation of public opinion.Methods: the methodology of narrative analysis of economics and original institutionalism is used in relation to the national innovation system.Results: with the help of narrative analysis, we analyzed 43 media outlets from Internet sources selected in accordance with the Medialogiya rating “Federal Mass Media: 2020” for the period from 01.01.2010 to 01.07.2021. A range of significant issues is highlighted which affect the innovative development, mentioned by media addressees and the Russian innovation system actors (policymakers, business, academic circles). Four types of positive narratives about the Russian innovation system are identified: 1) narratives about significant technological achievements; 2) narratives about the development of innovative infrastructure; 3) narratives that tell about the public recognition of the success of the Russian innovation system actors at professional conferences or by the state; 4) futurological narratives about prospects in the medium or long term.Scientific novelty: consists in the development of the narrative economics approach and the concept of public arenas for the analysis of the Russian innovation system with the help of mass media.Practical significance: the identified positive narratives allow studying the best practices and rules that contribute to the integration of science, government and business into a single innovation system in order to further upscale the positive experience to the entire economy. Positive narratives also contribute to the formation of a favorable innovation space and public opinion in Russia.","PeriodicalId":284471,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Economics and Law","volume":"70 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Economics and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21202/2782-2923.2021.4.641-660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Objective: to examine the influence of positive and critical narratives in the media, illustrating the problems and strengths of the Russian innovation system development, on the formation of public opinion.Methods: the methodology of narrative analysis of economics and original institutionalism is used in relation to the national innovation system.Results: with the help of narrative analysis, we analyzed 43 media outlets from Internet sources selected in accordance with the Medialogiya rating “Federal Mass Media: 2020” for the period from 01.01.2010 to 01.07.2021. A range of significant issues is highlighted which affect the innovative development, mentioned by media addressees and the Russian innovation system actors (policymakers, business, academic circles). Four types of positive narratives about the Russian innovation system are identified: 1) narratives about significant technological achievements; 2) narratives about the development of innovative infrastructure; 3) narratives that tell about the public recognition of the success of the Russian innovation system actors at professional conferences or by the state; 4) futurological narratives about prospects in the medium or long term.Scientific novelty: consists in the development of the narrative economics approach and the concept of public arenas for the analysis of the Russian innovation system with the help of mass media.Practical significance: the identified positive narratives allow studying the best practices and rules that contribute to the integration of science, government and business into a single innovation system in order to further upscale the positive experience to the entire economy. Positive narratives also contribute to the formation of a favorable innovation space and public opinion in Russia.
目的:考察媒体中积极和批判性叙事的影响,说明俄罗斯创新体系发展的问题和优势,对舆论形成的影响。方法:运用经济学和原始制度主义的叙事分析方法对国家创新体系进行研究。结果:根据Medialogiya评级“Federal Mass media: 2020”,我们选取了43家互联网媒体,选取时间为2010年1月1日至2021年7月1日。文章强调了一系列影响创新发展的重要问题,这些问题由媒体和俄罗斯创新系统参与者(政策制定者、企业、学术界)提到。研究发现,关于俄罗斯创新体系的正面叙事有四种类型:1)关于重大技术成果的叙事;2)关于创新基础设施发展的叙述;3)讲述公众在专业会议上或国家对俄罗斯创新体系参与者成功的认可;4)对中期或长期前景的未来论叙述。科学新颖性:包括叙事经济学方法和公共领域概念的发展,以借助大众传媒分析俄罗斯的创新体系。实践意义:确定的积极叙述允许研究有助于将科学,政府和商业整合到单一创新系统中的最佳实践和规则,以便进一步将积极经验提升到整个经济中。积极叙事也有助于在俄罗斯形成有利的创新空间和舆论。