An Empirical Study of the I Test for Exact Data Dependence

K. Psarris, S. Pande
{"title":"An Empirical Study of the I Test for Exact Data Dependence","authors":"K. Psarris, S. Pande","doi":"10.1109/ICPP.1994.55","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Parallelizing Compilers rely upon subscript analysis to detect data dependences between pairs of array references inside loop nests. The most widely used approximate subscript analysis tests are the GCD test and the Banerjee test. In an earlier work we proposed the I test, an improved subscript analysis test. The I test extends the accuracy of a combination of the GCD test and the Banerjee test. It is also able to provide exact data dependence information at no additional computation cost. In the present work we perform an empirical study on the Perfect Club benchmarks to demonstrate the effectiveness and practical importance of the I Test. We compare its performance with that of the GCD test and the Banerjee test. We show that the I test is always an exact test in practice.","PeriodicalId":162043,"journal":{"name":"1994 International Conference on Parallel Processing Vol. 3","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1994-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1994 International Conference on Parallel Processing Vol. 3","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPP.1994.55","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Parallelizing Compilers rely upon subscript analysis to detect data dependences between pairs of array references inside loop nests. The most widely used approximate subscript analysis tests are the GCD test and the Banerjee test. In an earlier work we proposed the I test, an improved subscript analysis test. The I test extends the accuracy of a combination of the GCD test and the Banerjee test. It is also able to provide exact data dependence information at no additional computation cost. In the present work we perform an empirical study on the Perfect Club benchmarks to demonstrate the effectiveness and practical importance of the I Test. We compare its performance with that of the GCD test and the Banerjee test. We show that the I test is always an exact test in practice.
精确数据依赖I检验的实证研究
并行编译器依靠下标分析来检测循环巢内数组引用对之间的数据依赖性。最广泛使用的近似下标分析检验是GCD检验和Banerjee检验。在早期的工作中,我们提出了I测试,这是一种改进的下标分析测试。I测试扩展了GCD测试和Banerjee测试组合的准确性。它还能够在不增加计算成本的情况下提供精确的数据依赖信息。在目前的工作中,我们对完美俱乐部基准进行了实证研究,以证明I测试的有效性和实践重要性。我们将其性能与GCD测试和Banerjee测试进行了比较。我们证明了I检验在实践中总是一个精确的检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信