Justiciability

D. Fairgrieve, Dan Squires QC
{"title":"Justiciability","authors":"D. Fairgrieve, Dan Squires QC","doi":"10.1163/2468-5992_rose_com_0147a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When determining a negligence claim brought against a public authority, the first question a court will need to consider is whether the claim is ‘justiciable’, ie whether it is suitable for judicial resolution. It is only if a claim is ‘justiciable’ that the court ought to go on to consider whether a duty of care is owed and has been breached. While there are matters that may be relevant to both justiciability and duty of care, justiciability ought to be determined as a preliminary question, or at least, as far as possible, kept conceptually separate from the determination of whether a defendant owed a duty of care.","PeriodicalId":147937,"journal":{"name":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition","volume":"85 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Negligence Liability of Public Authorities, Second Edition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/2468-5992_rose_com_0147a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

When determining a negligence claim brought against a public authority, the first question a court will need to consider is whether the claim is ‘justiciable’, ie whether it is suitable for judicial resolution. It is only if a claim is ‘justiciable’ that the court ought to go on to consider whether a duty of care is owed and has been breached. While there are matters that may be relevant to both justiciability and duty of care, justiciability ought to be determined as a preliminary question, or at least, as far as possible, kept conceptually separate from the determination of whether a defendant owed a duty of care.
可诉性
在裁定向公共当局提出的疏忽申索时,法院需要考虑的第一个问题是该申索是否“可予审理”,即是否适合司法解决。只有当一项索赔是“可审理的”时,法院才应该继续考虑是否负有注意义务并已被违反。虽然有些事项可能与可诉性和注意义务都有关,但应将可诉性确定为一个初步问题,或者至少尽可能在概念上与确定被告是否负有注意义务分开。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信