On Two Competing Mechanisms for Priority-based Allocation Problems with General Weak Priorities

Wataru Ishida
{"title":"On Two Competing Mechanisms for Priority-based Allocation Problems with General Weak Priorities","authors":"Wataru Ishida","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3098685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a priority based allocation problem with general weak priorities. We focus on two strategy-proof mechanisms: the deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism and the top trading cycles (TTC) mechanism. We give two conditions on weak priority structures whereby each of the DA mechanism and TTC mechanism with an arbitrarily fixed tie-breaking rule is stable and efficient. Our conditions are a generalization of each of Ergin (2002) 's and Kesten (2006)'s conditions about strict priorities. Our two conditions do not imply each other, whereas it is known that Kesten's condition implies Ergin's condition. Our analysis shows that a strategy-proof selection from stable and efficient matchings can be done for a larger domain of priority structures than the domain of Ehlers and Erdil (2010).","PeriodicalId":373527,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Game Theory (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3098685","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We consider a priority based allocation problem with general weak priorities. We focus on two strategy-proof mechanisms: the deferred acceptance (DA) mechanism and the top trading cycles (TTC) mechanism. We give two conditions on weak priority structures whereby each of the DA mechanism and TTC mechanism with an arbitrarily fixed tie-breaking rule is stable and efficient. Our conditions are a generalization of each of Ergin (2002) 's and Kesten (2006)'s conditions about strict priorities. Our two conditions do not imply each other, whereas it is known that Kesten's condition implies Ergin's condition. Our analysis shows that a strategy-proof selection from stable and efficient matchings can be done for a larger domain of priority structures than the domain of Ehlers and Erdil (2010).
一般弱优先级分配问题的两种竞争机制
考虑一个具有一般弱优先级的基于优先级的分配问题。我们关注两种策略验证机制:延迟接受(DA)机制和顶部交易周期(TTC)机制。在弱优先级结构下,我们给出了两种条件,即具有任意固定断线规则的DA机制和TTC机制都是稳定有效的。我们的条件是对Ergin (2002)’s和Kesten(2006)关于严格优先级的条件。我们的两种情况并不相互暗示,然而众所周知,Kesten的情况暗示了Ergin的情况。我们的分析表明,在比Ehlers和Erdil(2010)的优先级结构领域更大的领域中,可以从稳定和有效的匹配中进行策略证明选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信