Problematika Dan Implikasi Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Pada Perseroan Terbatas

Krista Yitawati, A. T. Haryani, Subadi, Adilla Nila Krusita
{"title":"Problematika Dan Implikasi Omnibus Law Cipta Kerja Pada Perseroan Terbatas","authors":"Krista Yitawati, A. T. Haryani, Subadi, Adilla Nila Krusita","doi":"10.33319/yume.v8i2.187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nAbstract— Despite the various controversies, the presence of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation have repealed at least two regulations and changed at least 80 (eight twenty) other laws. One of those affected is the Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UU PT). Study This study intends to examine what the existing concepts and problems look like on the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, as well as its implications for the regulation and the basic concept of a Limited Liability Company. This study is a normative research (doctrinal) to secondary data obtained from literature studies (library research), which consists of primary and secondary legal materials. Research result shows that the Omnibus Law is a legislative method by unites various types of laws into one specific law. This has the potential to negate the diverse interests of each laws in the name of one interest only. In addition, the practice of drafting it in Indonesia does not have a juridical basis and violates the principle of openness and participation. In terms of its implications for the PT Law, a number of the provisions in the Omnibus Law on Job Creation have expanded the meaning of the Company Limited by presenting the Sole Proprietorship model which gives birth to a number of contradictions in the basic concept of a Limited Liability Company, in addition to removing the minimum capital limit of the Company which is feared will cause vulnerabilities for business continuity.","PeriodicalId":339930,"journal":{"name":"YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YUSTISIA MERDEKA : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33319/yume.v8i2.187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

  Abstract— Despite the various controversies, the presence of the Omnibus Law on Job Creation have repealed at least two regulations and changed at least 80 (eight twenty) other laws. One of those affected is the Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies (UU PT). Study This study intends to examine what the existing concepts and problems look like on the Omnibus Law on Job Creation, as well as its implications for the regulation and the basic concept of a Limited Liability Company. This study is a normative research (doctrinal) to secondary data obtained from literature studies (library research), which consists of primary and secondary legal materials. Research result shows that the Omnibus Law is a legislative method by unites various types of laws into one specific law. This has the potential to negate the diverse interests of each laws in the name of one interest only. In addition, the practice of drafting it in Indonesia does not have a juridical basis and violates the principle of openness and participation. In terms of its implications for the PT Law, a number of the provisions in the Omnibus Law on Job Creation have expanded the meaning of the Company Limited by presenting the Sole Proprietorship model which gives birth to a number of contradictions in the basic concept of a Limited Liability Company, in addition to removing the minimum capital limit of the Company which is feared will cause vulnerabilities for business continuity.
摘要-尽管存在各种争议,但《创造就业综合法》的存在已经废除了至少两项法规,并改变了至少80项(8项)其他法律。其中受影响的是2007年关于有限责任公司(UU PT)的第40号法律。本研究旨在探讨《创造就业综合法》中现有的概念和问题,以及其对有限责任公司的监管和基本概念的影响。本研究是对从文献研究(图书馆研究)中获得的二手数据的规范研究(理论研究),由一手和二手法律材料组成。研究结果表明,综合法是将各类法律统一为一种具体法律的立法方式。这有可能只以一种利益的名义否定每项法律的各种利益。此外,在印度尼西亚起草《公约》的做法没有法律依据,违反了公开和参与的原则。就其对《雇佣法》的影响而言,《创造就业综合法》中的一些条款通过提出独资模式扩大了有限公司的含义,这在有限责任公司的基本概念中产生了一些矛盾,此外还取消了公司的最低资本限制,担心这会导致业务连续性的脆弱性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信