Engineering as a political activity

E. Woodhouse
{"title":"Engineering as a political activity","authors":"E. Woodhouse","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS.1997.658857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Because the practice of engineering authoritatively reshapes the world, it deserves to be seen as a public and political activity. If technology is a form of legislation, are engineers the legislators or do they occupy some other political role? Because engineering in the 20th century has served some social interests much better than others, might those who have been disadvantaged reasonably construe engineers as their political opponents? What constraints face engineers individually and collectively in attempting to reconsider and retarget beliefs and actions bearing on their work as technological decision makers?.","PeriodicalId":226458,"journal":{"name":"1997 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change. Proceedings","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1997 International Symposium on Technology and Society Technology and Society at a Time of Sweeping Change. Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS.1997.658857","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Because the practice of engineering authoritatively reshapes the world, it deserves to be seen as a public and political activity. If technology is a form of legislation, are engineers the legislators or do they occupy some other political role? Because engineering in the 20th century has served some social interests much better than others, might those who have been disadvantaged reasonably construe engineers as their political opponents? What constraints face engineers individually and collectively in attempting to reconsider and retarget beliefs and actions bearing on their work as technological decision makers?.
工程作为一种政治活动
因为工程实践权威性地重塑了世界,它应该被视为一种公共和政治活动。如果技术是立法的一种形式,那么工程师是立法者还是他们扮演着其他的政治角色?由于工程在20世纪为一些社会利益提供了比其他利益更好的服务,那些处于不利地位的人是否可以合理地将工程师视为他们的政治对手?作为技术决策者,工程师个人和集体在试图重新考虑和重新定位与他们的工作有关的信念和行动时面临哪些限制?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信