Carolyne Abdullah, Christopher F. Karpowitz, Chad Raphael
{"title":"A Conversation with Jane J. Mansbridge and Martha McCoy","authors":"Carolyne Abdullah, Christopher F. Karpowitz, Chad Raphael","doi":"10.16997/JDD.257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Jane J. Mansbridge, Charles F. Adams Professor of Political Leadership and Democratic Values, and Martha McCoy, Executive Director of Everyday Democracy, discuss deliberative equity and equality in theory and practice. They identify potential tensions and trade-offs between the two values and between these values and other deliberative aims. They discuss how practitioners have attempted to promote equal and equitable deliberative processes and the challenges of measuring these concepts in deliberative settings. Their conversation provides insights into best practices for enabling marginalized groups to engage in deliberation and the persistent challenges that remain. Together, Mansbridge and McCoy outline opportunities for future theoretical and empirical progress in better understanding and ultimately building effective deliberative groups, institutions, and systems.","PeriodicalId":147188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Deliberation","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Deliberation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16997/JDD.257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Jane J. Mansbridge, Charles F. Adams Professor of Political Leadership and Democratic Values, and Martha McCoy, Executive Director of Everyday Democracy, discuss deliberative equity and equality in theory and practice. They identify potential tensions and trade-offs between the two values and between these values and other deliberative aims. They discuss how practitioners have attempted to promote equal and equitable deliberative processes and the challenges of measuring these concepts in deliberative settings. Their conversation provides insights into best practices for enabling marginalized groups to engage in deliberation and the persistent challenges that remain. Together, Mansbridge and McCoy outline opportunities for future theoretical and empirical progress in better understanding and ultimately building effective deliberative groups, institutions, and systems.
查尔斯·f·亚当斯政治领导与民主价值观教授Jane J. Mansbridge和日常民主执行主任Martha McCoy讨论了理论与实践中的协商公平和平等。它们确定了两种价值观之间以及这些价值观与其他审议目标之间的潜在紧张关系和权衡。他们讨论了从业者如何试图促进平等和公平的审议过程,以及在审议环境中衡量这些概念的挑战。他们的对话提供了使边缘化群体能够参与审议的最佳做法和仍然存在的持续挑战的见解。Mansbridge和McCoy共同概述了未来在更好地理解和最终建立有效的审议小组、机构和系统方面的理论和实证进展的机会。