Respiratory Function and Physical Capacity in Combustible Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Users: a Two-Year Follow-Up Cohort Study

A. Sharman, I. Yermakova, Elmira Erenchina, Gulnara Tyulebekova, Aisulu Bekzhanova
{"title":"Respiratory Function and Physical Capacity in Combustible Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Users: a Two-Year Follow-Up Cohort Study","authors":"A. Sharman, I. Yermakova, Elmira Erenchina, Gulnara Tyulebekova, Aisulu Bekzhanova","doi":"10.12974/2312-5470.2021.07.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Cigarette smoking is the most common risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is the fourth leading cause of death in Kazakhstan. Prior literature suggests that heated tobacco products (HTP) might be a better option for people who cannot quit smoking. The aim of this paper was to analyze the long-term effects of shifting to HTP use compared to continued combustible cigarettes (CC) use in long-term smokers. \nMethods: A cohort of 1200 participants (400 HTP and 800 CC) aged 40-59 years with a minimum of 10 pack-year smoking history were recruited. The functional outcomes compared between HTP and CC users included: (1) COPD Assessment Test (CAT); (2) post-bronchodilator lung function; (3) 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) test; and (4) metabolic syndrome components. Multivariable linear mixed models were used to test associations between health outcomes and smoking type (HTP vs. CC) over time. \nResults: After 24-month 188 (117 CC users and 71 HTP users) participants were lost to follow-up, while 107 (9%) participants quit smoking. The loss to follow-up was similar in both groups with 15% for CC users and 18% for HTP users. Liner mixed models showed HTP use was associated with lesser decrease in functional outcomes over time compared to CC users. Lung function decrease was significantly less in HTP users, while CAT scores, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure were significantly better compared to CC users. \nConclusion: This study demonstrated that while both CC and HTP users experienced decrease in lung function, HTP users experienced it to a significantly lesser degree, while demonstrating better CAT score and physical characteristics compared to CC users. The results of this study suggest that HTP might be a less deleterious alternative compared to CC in people with long history of CC use and who cannot quit smoking.","PeriodicalId":245488,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Respiratory Care","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Respiratory Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12974/2312-5470.2021.07.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Background: Cigarette smoking is the most common risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which is the fourth leading cause of death in Kazakhstan. Prior literature suggests that heated tobacco products (HTP) might be a better option for people who cannot quit smoking. The aim of this paper was to analyze the long-term effects of shifting to HTP use compared to continued combustible cigarettes (CC) use in long-term smokers. Methods: A cohort of 1200 participants (400 HTP and 800 CC) aged 40-59 years with a minimum of 10 pack-year smoking history were recruited. The functional outcomes compared between HTP and CC users included: (1) COPD Assessment Test (CAT); (2) post-bronchodilator lung function; (3) 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) test; and (4) metabolic syndrome components. Multivariable linear mixed models were used to test associations between health outcomes and smoking type (HTP vs. CC) over time. Results: After 24-month 188 (117 CC users and 71 HTP users) participants were lost to follow-up, while 107 (9%) participants quit smoking. The loss to follow-up was similar in both groups with 15% for CC users and 18% for HTP users. Liner mixed models showed HTP use was associated with lesser decrease in functional outcomes over time compared to CC users. Lung function decrease was significantly less in HTP users, while CAT scores, waist circumference, and systolic blood pressure were significantly better compared to CC users. Conclusion: This study demonstrated that while both CC and HTP users experienced decrease in lung function, HTP users experienced it to a significantly lesser degree, while demonstrating better CAT score and physical characteristics compared to CC users. The results of this study suggest that HTP might be a less deleterious alternative compared to CC in people with long history of CC use and who cannot quit smoking.
可燃香烟和加热烟草制品使用者的呼吸功能和体能:一项为期两年的随访队列研究
背景:吸烟是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)最常见的危险因素,是哈萨克斯坦第四大死亡原因。先前的文献表明,加热烟草产品(HTP)可能是无法戒烟的人的更好选择。本文的目的是分析长期吸烟者转向使用HTP与继续使用可燃香烟(CC)的长期影响。方法:招募了1200名年龄在40-59岁、至少有10包年吸烟史的参与者(400 HTP和800 CC)。HTP和CC使用者的功能结局比较包括:(1)COPD评估测试(CAT);(2)支气管扩张剂后肺功能;(3) 6分钟步行距离(6MWD)测试;(4)代谢综合征成分。使用多变量线性混合模型来测试健康结果与吸烟类型(HTP vs. CC)之间随时间的关系。结果:24个月后,188名参与者(117名CC使用者和71名HTP使用者)失去随访,107名(9%)参与者戒烟。两组的随访损失相似,CC用户为15%,HTP用户为18%。线性混合模型显示,随着时间的推移,与CC用户相比,HTP使用与功能结果的下降较小。与CC使用者相比,HTP使用者的肺功能下降明显更少,而CAT评分、腰围和收缩压明显更好。结论:本研究表明,与CC使用者相比,CC使用者和HTP使用者均出现肺功能下降,但HTP使用者的肺功能下降程度明显较低,而CAT评分和身体特征均优于CC使用者。这项研究的结果表明,对于长期使用CC且无法戒烟的人来说,HTP可能是一种危害较小的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信