The Effect of Using Buzz Group and Talking Chips Technique on Students’ Speaking Ability at Senior High School

Erika Sinambela, Poster Sagala, A. Pasaribu
{"title":"The Effect of Using Buzz Group and Talking Chips Technique on Students’ Speaking Ability at Senior High School","authors":"Erika Sinambela, Poster Sagala, A. Pasaribu","doi":"10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study deals with the effect of using controlled Buzz Group technique and Talking Chips technique on students’ speaking ability. The objectives are to find out the effect of using Buzz Group technique and Talking Chips technique on students’ speaking ability and which technique is the most effective one. The method that was used in this research was quantitative through quasi-experimental research that incriminating three classes were experimental class 1, experimental class 2 and control class, in the experimental class the writer applied Buzz Group technique and Talking Chips technique while in controlled class applied without treatment. The population of this study was the eleventh-grade students of SMA Kristen Kalam Kudus Medan. The researcher used 75 students as the sample. The sample of this research was taken by using cluster sampling technique, 25 from XI-1 and 25 XI-2 as experimental class and 25 from XI-3 as controlled class. To obtain the data the researcher used speaking oral test. The instruments used to gather the data were students’ pre-test & post-test scores that were calculated and analyzed by using IBM SPSS 23.0. These tests consisted of two types, namely pre-test and post-test. The result of analyzing the data, the mean score for pre-test in experimental class one (Buzz Group technique) is 60.80 and the mean score for post-test is 79.60. The mean score for pre-test in experimental class two (Talking Chips technique) is 50.12 and the mean score for post-test is 74.24. The mean score for pre-test in control class is 66.76 and the mean score for post-test is 74.44. As the result of the ANOVA test, P= 0.00 < 0.05 or F count = 23.59 > F table = 2.28. It means that hypothesis alternative (Ha) was accepted while the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. In conclusion, the using of Talking Stick technique and Buzz Group technique is modestly effective on students’ speaking ability of asking and giving opinion of eleventh grade at SMA Kristen Kalam Kudus Medan academic year 2022/2023 and Talking Chips technique is more effective than Buzz Group technique in teaching speaking skill. Based on the explanation above, this research can be chosen as one alternative technique in teaching speaking.","PeriodicalId":427899,"journal":{"name":"IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i2.3055","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study deals with the effect of using controlled Buzz Group technique and Talking Chips technique on students’ speaking ability. The objectives are to find out the effect of using Buzz Group technique and Talking Chips technique on students’ speaking ability and which technique is the most effective one. The method that was used in this research was quantitative through quasi-experimental research that incriminating three classes were experimental class 1, experimental class 2 and control class, in the experimental class the writer applied Buzz Group technique and Talking Chips technique while in controlled class applied without treatment. The population of this study was the eleventh-grade students of SMA Kristen Kalam Kudus Medan. The researcher used 75 students as the sample. The sample of this research was taken by using cluster sampling technique, 25 from XI-1 and 25 XI-2 as experimental class and 25 from XI-3 as controlled class. To obtain the data the researcher used speaking oral test. The instruments used to gather the data were students’ pre-test & post-test scores that were calculated and analyzed by using IBM SPSS 23.0. These tests consisted of two types, namely pre-test and post-test. The result of analyzing the data, the mean score for pre-test in experimental class one (Buzz Group technique) is 60.80 and the mean score for post-test is 79.60. The mean score for pre-test in experimental class two (Talking Chips technique) is 50.12 and the mean score for post-test is 74.24. The mean score for pre-test in control class is 66.76 and the mean score for post-test is 74.44. As the result of the ANOVA test, P= 0.00 < 0.05 or F count = 23.59 > F table = 2.28. It means that hypothesis alternative (Ha) was accepted while the null hypothesis (Ho) was rejected. In conclusion, the using of Talking Stick technique and Buzz Group technique is modestly effective on students’ speaking ability of asking and giving opinion of eleventh grade at SMA Kristen Kalam Kudus Medan academic year 2022/2023 and Talking Chips technique is more effective than Buzz Group technique in teaching speaking skill. Based on the explanation above, this research can be chosen as one alternative technique in teaching speaking.
使用“嗡嗡群”和“谈话筹码”技术对高中学生口语能力的影响
本研究探讨了控制性的Buzz Group技巧和Talking Chips技巧对学生口语能力的影响。目的是了解使用Buzz Group技术和Talking Chips技术对学生口语能力的影响,以及哪种技术最有效。本研究采用准实验研究定量化的方法,分为实验1班、实验2班和对照班三个班,实验组采用Buzz Group技术和Talking Chips技术,对照组不加处理。本研究的人群是SMA的11年级学生Kristen Kalam Kudus Medan。研究人员以75名学生为样本。为了获得数据,研究人员使用口语测试。收集数据的工具是学生测试前和测试后的成绩,使用IBM SPSS 23.0进行计算和分析。这些测试包括两种类型,即前测和后测。经数据分析,实验一班(Buzz Group技术)的前测均分为60.80分,后测均分为79.60分。实验二班(Talking Chips technique)前测均分为50.12分,后测均分为74.24分。对照组前测均分为66.76分,后测均分为74.44分。方差分析的结果为P= 0.00 < 0.05或F计数= 23.59 > F表= 2.28。即接受备选假设(Ha),拒绝原假设(Ho)。综上所述,在2022/2023学年度的SMA高二学生中,使用Talking Stick技术和Buzz Group技术对学生提问和给出意见的口语能力有一定的效果,Talking Chips技术比Buzz Group技术在口语技能教学上更有效。基于上述解释,本研究可以作为口语教学的一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信