A Comparative Analysis: A Review of a Qualitative Approach and a Quantitative Approach to Examining Stress and Coping for Targets Enduring Workplace Bullying

C. Patrick
{"title":"A Comparative Analysis: A Review of a Qualitative Approach and a Quantitative Approach to Examining Stress and Coping for Targets Enduring Workplace Bullying","authors":"C. Patrick","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3150907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Workplace bullying is a global problem that is tackled by different countries with different strategies. Some countries have prohibited workplace bullying, while others still grapple with the problem. Just as countries have different approaches to dealing with workplace bullying, researchers have varied strategies for analyzing bullying. This article will look at two researchers who studied workplace bullying and the resulting coping mechanisms used by the target. However, one researcher, Karatuna (2015) employs a qualitative approach to interview 20 workers in Turkey and how they cope with stress. The results lead to five themes explaining how workers cope with bullying. In comparison, Hollis (2017) used a survey method to study 355 American higher education employees and how they cope with stress. The predictive statistical analysis of Chi-Square showed that women are more likely to resign to cope with workplace bullying. While a target’s exit and resignation was a common finding for both researchers, the researchers used different approaches to determine the impact of workplace bullying.","PeriodicalId":337628,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Personnel Policies (Topic)","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Personnel Policies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3150907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Workplace bullying is a global problem that is tackled by different countries with different strategies. Some countries have prohibited workplace bullying, while others still grapple with the problem. Just as countries have different approaches to dealing with workplace bullying, researchers have varied strategies for analyzing bullying. This article will look at two researchers who studied workplace bullying and the resulting coping mechanisms used by the target. However, one researcher, Karatuna (2015) employs a qualitative approach to interview 20 workers in Turkey and how they cope with stress. The results lead to five themes explaining how workers cope with bullying. In comparison, Hollis (2017) used a survey method to study 355 American higher education employees and how they cope with stress. The predictive statistical analysis of Chi-Square showed that women are more likely to resign to cope with workplace bullying. While a target’s exit and resignation was a common finding for both researchers, the researchers used different approaches to determine the impact of workplace bullying.
比较分析:工作场所霸凌目标压力与应对的定性与定量研究综述
工作场所欺凌是一个全球性问题,不同国家采取不同策略应对。一些国家已经禁止职场欺凌,而另一些国家仍在努力解决这个问题。正如各国处理职场欺凌的方法不同一样,研究人员分析欺凌的策略也各不相同。这篇文章将介绍两位研究职场欺凌的研究人员,他们研究了欺凌者的应对机制。然而,一位研究者Karatuna(2015)采用定性方法采访了土耳其的20名工人,以及他们如何应对压力。研究结果引出了解释员工如何应对欺凌的五个主题。相比之下,Hollis(2017)采用调查方法研究了355名美国高等教育员工以及他们如何应对压力。卡方预测统计分析显示,女性更有可能为应对职场欺凌而辞职。虽然目标的退出和辞职是两位研究人员的共同发现,但研究人员使用了不同的方法来确定职场欺凌的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信