A Good Investment: The Updated Productivity of Public Charter Schools in Eight U.S. Cities

Corey A. DeAngelis, Patrick J. Wolf, L. Maloney, Jay F. May
{"title":"A Good Investment: The Updated Productivity of Public Charter Schools in Eight U.S. Cities","authors":"Corey A. DeAngelis, Patrick J. Wolf, L. Maloney, Jay F. May","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3366979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2015-16, the United states spent over $660 billion on its public education system in hopes of providing children with greater opportunities to excel academically and to improve their life trajectories. While public education dollars have risen at a relatively fast pace historically, future challenges, including underfunded pension liabilities, suggest policymakers should economize wherever possible. Meanwhile, the number of public charter schools has increased exponentially. from 1991 to 2018, charter school legislation passed in 44 states and the nation’s capital, and student enrollment in charters increased to around 3.2 million. Since educational resources are limited, we examine which types of schooling offer society the biggest “bang for the buck.” both cost- effectiveness and return-on-investment analyses (ROI) compare the productivity of different organizations providing a similar service – in this case, public education. cost-effectiveness is “the efficacy of a program in achieving given intervention outcomes in relation to the program costs.” We examine the differences in cost-effectiveness and ROI for public charter schools and traditional public schools (TPS) in eight major U.S. cities: Atlanta, Boston, Denver, Houston, Indianapolis, New York City, San Antonio, and the District of Columbia. We determine how much money is invested in public charter schools and TPS, what levels of student achievement are attained across the two public school sectors, and how much economic payoff our society can expect to receive as a result of the educational investments in each sector. this report is an update to our first study examining these differences across the United states at the city level.","PeriodicalId":137820,"journal":{"name":"Political Economy: National","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Economy: National","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3366979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In 2015-16, the United states spent over $660 billion on its public education system in hopes of providing children with greater opportunities to excel academically and to improve their life trajectories. While public education dollars have risen at a relatively fast pace historically, future challenges, including underfunded pension liabilities, suggest policymakers should economize wherever possible. Meanwhile, the number of public charter schools has increased exponentially. from 1991 to 2018, charter school legislation passed in 44 states and the nation’s capital, and student enrollment in charters increased to around 3.2 million. Since educational resources are limited, we examine which types of schooling offer society the biggest “bang for the buck.” both cost- effectiveness and return-on-investment analyses (ROI) compare the productivity of different organizations providing a similar service – in this case, public education. cost-effectiveness is “the efficacy of a program in achieving given intervention outcomes in relation to the program costs.” We examine the differences in cost-effectiveness and ROI for public charter schools and traditional public schools (TPS) in eight major U.S. cities: Atlanta, Boston, Denver, Houston, Indianapolis, New York City, San Antonio, and the District of Columbia. We determine how much money is invested in public charter schools and TPS, what levels of student achievement are attained across the two public school sectors, and how much economic payoff our society can expect to receive as a result of the educational investments in each sector. this report is an update to our first study examining these differences across the United states at the city level.
一项好的投资:美国八个城市公立特许学校的最新生产力
2015年至2016年,美国在公共教育系统上花费了6600多亿美元,希望为孩子们提供更多的学习机会,改善他们的生活轨迹。虽然公共教育资金在历史上以相对较快的速度增长,但未来的挑战,包括资金不足的养老金负债,表明政策制定者应该尽可能地节约开支。与此同时,公立特许学校的数量呈指数增长。从1991年到2018年,美国44个州和首都通过了特许学校立法,特许学校的学生人数增加到320万左右。由于教育资源有限,我们研究了哪种类型的学校教育为社会提供了最大的“效益”。成本效益分析和投资回报分析(ROI)都是比较提供类似服务的不同组织的生产率——在这种情况下是公共教育。成本效益是“一个项目在实现与项目成本相关的既定干预结果方面的效率”。我们研究了美国八个主要城市(亚特兰大、波士顿、丹佛、休斯顿、印第安纳波利斯、纽约市、圣安东尼奥和哥伦比亚特区)公立特许学校和传统公立学校(TPS)在成本效益和投资回报率方面的差异。我们确定了在公立特许学校和TPS上投入了多少资金,两个公立学校部门的学生成绩达到了什么水平,以及我们的社会可以期望从每个部门的教育投资中获得多少经济回报。这份报告是我们在美国城市层面上对这些差异进行的第一项研究的更新。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信