Factors Determining Enrollee’s Choice of Private and Public Healthcare Providers of Community Based Health Insurance Scheme in Edu Lga Kwara State

Sheshi Idris Mohammed, Agbana Emmanuel Busayo, Sani Mohammed Dambam, Jiya Samuel Ndagi, Liman Abbas Shu'aibu
{"title":"Factors Determining Enrollee’s Choice of Private and Public Healthcare Providers of Community Based Health Insurance Scheme in Edu Lga Kwara State","authors":"Sheshi Idris Mohammed, Agbana Emmanuel Busayo, Sani Mohammed Dambam, Jiya Samuel Ndagi, Liman Abbas Shu'aibu","doi":"10.47672/ejhs.1289","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Private sector is the major providers of Primary health care for the poor in many low- and middle-income countries. In the public healthcare providers, the health facilities are built by the government and the healthcare workers, draw their salaries from government treasuries. In the private providers, the health facilities are owned by individual or a group of people and the salaries of the workers are paid from the resources generated in the facilities. They are either for profit or non-profit making. Enrollees are given freehand to choose either of the providers, but the information available to them is not enough to make decision on which of the providers to choose. This study aimed at determining the enrollee’s choice of private and public healthcare providers of community-based health insurance scheme in Edu LGA Kwara state. \nMethodology: The design was descriptive cross-sectional study. Sample size of 400 was used in each of the provider. The respondents were recruited by systematic sampling method among private healthcare provider while multistage sampling method was adopted in public healthcare providers. Data was collected using semi structured questionnaire. Focus Group Discussion was also carried out. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. Results were tabulated and logistic regression was adopted to determine level of significance. Level of Significance was set at P<0.05 \nFindings: Nine- point-five (9.5%) of the respondents of the private healthcare provider and 5.7% of the respondents of the public healthcare providers had good knowledge score of community based health insurance scheme. The difference in knowledge score was statistically significant as the p=0.035. Mode of premium collection had Odd ratio 2.99 (CI =1.934- 4.622), P<0.001; Trust of the system Odd ratio 2.987 (CI = 1.884-4.733); Quality of health care Odd ratio 2.673 (CI = 1.757-4.065) P<0.001; Proximity to health facility Odd ratio 2.225 (CI = 1.412-3.506) P=0.001. Mode of joining the scheme Odd ratio 0.400 (CI = 0.290-0.552) P<0.001 and cost of accessing care Odd ratio 0.577 (CI = 0.42-0.779) P<0.001. \nRecommendation: It was recommended that private health facilities should be maintained which will improve access to health care for the enrollees. The government should also improve the quality of health care in the public healthcare providers.","PeriodicalId":224837,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Sciences","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47672/ejhs.1289","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Private sector is the major providers of Primary health care for the poor in many low- and middle-income countries. In the public healthcare providers, the health facilities are built by the government and the healthcare workers, draw their salaries from government treasuries. In the private providers, the health facilities are owned by individual or a group of people and the salaries of the workers are paid from the resources generated in the facilities. They are either for profit or non-profit making. Enrollees are given freehand to choose either of the providers, but the information available to them is not enough to make decision on which of the providers to choose. This study aimed at determining the enrollee’s choice of private and public healthcare providers of community-based health insurance scheme in Edu LGA Kwara state. Methodology: The design was descriptive cross-sectional study. Sample size of 400 was used in each of the provider. The respondents were recruited by systematic sampling method among private healthcare provider while multistage sampling method was adopted in public healthcare providers. Data was collected using semi structured questionnaire. Focus Group Discussion was also carried out. Data collected were analyzed using SPSS version 23.0. Results were tabulated and logistic regression was adopted to determine level of significance. Level of Significance was set at P<0.05 Findings: Nine- point-five (9.5%) of the respondents of the private healthcare provider and 5.7% of the respondents of the public healthcare providers had good knowledge score of community based health insurance scheme. The difference in knowledge score was statistically significant as the p=0.035. Mode of premium collection had Odd ratio 2.99 (CI =1.934- 4.622), P<0.001; Trust of the system Odd ratio 2.987 (CI = 1.884-4.733); Quality of health care Odd ratio 2.673 (CI = 1.757-4.065) P<0.001; Proximity to health facility Odd ratio 2.225 (CI = 1.412-3.506) P=0.001. Mode of joining the scheme Odd ratio 0.400 (CI = 0.290-0.552) P<0.001 and cost of accessing care Odd ratio 0.577 (CI = 0.42-0.779) P<0.001. Recommendation: It was recommended that private health facilities should be maintained which will improve access to health care for the enrollees. The government should also improve the quality of health care in the public healthcare providers.
在Edu Lga Kwara州,决定注册者选择社区医疗保险计划的私人和公共医疗保健提供者的因素
目的:在许多低收入和中等收入国家,私营部门是穷人初级保健的主要提供者。在公共医疗机构中,医疗设施由政府建造,医疗工作者的工资来自政府的国库。在私营机构中,保健设施由个人或一群人所有,工作人员的工资由设施产生的资源支付。它们要么是盈利的,要么是非盈利的。登记者可以自由选择两家医疗机构,但是他们所能获得的信息不足以决定选择哪一家医疗机构。本研究旨在确定Edu LGA Kwara州以社区为基础的健康保险计划的注册者对私人和公共医疗保健提供者的选择。方法:设计为描述性横断面研究。每个供应商的样本量为400。调查对象在民营医疗机构中采用系统抽样法,在公立医疗机构中采用多阶段抽样法。采用半结构化问卷法收集数据。还进行了焦点小组讨论。收集的数据使用SPSS 23.0版本进行分析。将结果制成表格,采用logistic回归确定显著性水平。结果显示:95.5%(9.5%)的受访私立医疗机构和5.7%(5.7%)的受访公立医疗机构对社区医疗保险计划有良好的了解。知识得分差异有统计学意义,p=0.035。保费收取方式的Odd比为2.99 (CI =1.934 ~ 4.622), P<0.001;系统信任奇数比2.987 (CI = 1.884-4.733);医疗服务质量奇比2.673 (CI = 1.757-4.065) P<0.001;接近卫生设施奇数比2.225 (CI = 1.412-3.506) P=0.001。参加方案方式的Odd比0.400 (CI = 0.290 ~ 0.552) P<0.001,获得护理费用的Odd比0.577 (CI = 0.42 ~ 0.779) P<0.001。建议:有人建议应保留私人保健设施,这将改善参保者获得保健的机会。政府还应提高公共医疗机构的医疗质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信