Three Big Ideas (and Some Big Concerns)

C. Estlund
{"title":"Three Big Ideas (and Some Big Concerns)","authors":"C. Estlund","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780197566107.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Chapter 5 turns from goals to means. It takes up Three Big Ideas that some tout as all-purpose solutions for a future of less work: UBI, a federal job guarantee (JG), or a shorter work week. Each has major virtues, but each faces daunting practical and political hurdles. More importantly, each of the Three Big Ideas fails on one of the three dimensions of a good livelihood that we should be aiming for: UBI falls short on ensuring a wide distribution of decent work; existing JG proposals fail to spread the benefits of more free time; and a shorter work week, standing alone, would fail to ensure adequate incomes. What we need is a multifaceted strategy that creates, conserves, and spreads work while supporting incomes of those who are otherwise unlikely to capture the dividends of a more automated economy.","PeriodicalId":170642,"journal":{"name":"Automation Anxiety","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automation Anxiety","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197566107.003.0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chapter 5 turns from goals to means. It takes up Three Big Ideas that some tout as all-purpose solutions for a future of less work: UBI, a federal job guarantee (JG), or a shorter work week. Each has major virtues, but each faces daunting practical and political hurdles. More importantly, each of the Three Big Ideas fails on one of the three dimensions of a good livelihood that we should be aiming for: UBI falls short on ensuring a wide distribution of decent work; existing JG proposals fail to spread the benefits of more free time; and a shorter work week, standing alone, would fail to ensure adequate incomes. What we need is a multifaceted strategy that creates, conserves, and spreads work while supporting incomes of those who are otherwise unlikely to capture the dividends of a more automated economy.
三大理念(以及一些大问题)
第五章从目标转向手段。它采用了三大理念,一些人认为这是未来工作减少的万能解决方案:全民基本收入,联邦工作保障(JG),或缩短每周工作时间。它们都有主要优点,但都面临着令人生畏的实际和政治障碍。更重要的是,三大理念中的每一个都在我们应该瞄准的良好生活的三个方面中的一个方面失败了:全民基本收入未能确保体面工作的广泛分配;现有的JG提案未能传播更多自由时间的好处;单靠缩短每周的工作时间,并不能保证足够的收入。我们需要的是一个多方面的战略,在创造、保存和分配工作的同时,支持那些不太可能从更加自动化的经济中获益的人的收入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信