Relationship between Reliability, Validity, and Measurement of Ground-reaction Force of Reaction Time by Employing Sit-to-stand Movement in Healthy Young Women

Y. Oyama, Urara Hiruma, Kotaro Komatsu
{"title":"Relationship between Reliability, Validity, and Measurement of Ground-reaction Force of Reaction Time by Employing Sit-to-stand Movement in Healthy Young Women","authors":"Y. Oyama, Urara Hiruma, Kotaro Komatsu","doi":"10.9759/hppt.11.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigated the reliability and validity of measuring reaction time by employing the sit-to-stand (STS) movement and examined its relationship with groundreaction force. The participants included 42 healthy young women (mean age 20.6±0.8 years). Whole body reaction time and STS reaction time as a measure of agility were evaluated. The peak reaction force per body weight, rate of force development and center of pressure moving distance were evaluated to measure ground-reaction force during STS movement. The Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for measuring the STS reaction time was high (ICC (1, 1)=0.735), thus confirming the reliability of the measurement. However, a significant relationship was shown between the STS reaction time and whole body reaction time (r=0.375, P=0.014). However, when the relationship with the ground-reaction force was examined, no relationship was found with all the ground reaction force variables. These results indicate that the STS reaction time is reliability and validity, it was suggested that there may be no association with the ground reaction force.","PeriodicalId":225008,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Health Promotion and Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.9759/hppt.11.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the reliability and validity of measuring reaction time by employing the sit-to-stand (STS) movement and examined its relationship with groundreaction force. The participants included 42 healthy young women (mean age 20.6±0.8 years). Whole body reaction time and STS reaction time as a measure of agility were evaluated. The peak reaction force per body weight, rate of force development and center of pressure moving distance were evaluated to measure ground-reaction force during STS movement. The Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for measuring the STS reaction time was high (ICC (1, 1)=0.735), thus confirming the reliability of the measurement. However, a significant relationship was shown between the STS reaction time and whole body reaction time (r=0.375, P=0.014). However, when the relationship with the ground-reaction force was examined, no relationship was found with all the ground reaction force variables. These results indicate that the STS reaction time is reliability and validity, it was suggested that there may be no association with the ground reaction force.
健康青年女性坐立运动对反应时间地面反作用力测量的信效度关系
本研究探讨了坐立运动测量反应时的信度和效度,并考察了反应时与地面反作用力的关系。参与者包括42名健康年轻女性(平均年龄20.6±0.8岁)。评估全身反应时间和STS反应时间作为敏捷性的衡量标准。评估了每体重的峰值反作用力、力的发展速度和压力中心移动距离,以测量STS运动时的地面反作用力。测定STS反应时的类内相关系数(Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC)较高(ICC(1,1)=0.735),证实了测定的可靠性。而STS反应时间与全身反应时间呈显著相关(r=0.375, P=0.014)。然而,当检查与地面反作用力的关系时,发现与地面反作用力的所有变量都没有关系。这些结果表明,STS反应时间具有信度和效度,可能与地面反作用力无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信