Retail Sample Boxes: Counteracting the Adverse Effect of Accelerated Learning via Future Credit

Alireza Yazdani, E. Çil, Michael S. Pangburn
{"title":"Retail Sample Boxes: Counteracting the Adverse Effect of Accelerated Learning via Future Credit","authors":"Alireza Yazdani, E. Çil, Michael S. Pangburn","doi":"10.1287/msom.2023.1206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Problem definition: Consumers often try a few varieties of an experience product before establishing a shopping routine. In retailing, a sample box typically refers to a package of multiple trial-sized varieties within a product category. Sample boxes potentially create value by helping consumers resolve their uncertainties regarding these varieties earlier and at a lower cost. In this paper, we study how firms and consumers share this added value under different market scenarios. We also derive the optimal pricing of sample boxes in product categories for which consumers make ongoing purchases over time. Academic/practical relevance: We thus extend the literature by proposing a framework that integrates sequential search and seller-induced learning. Methodology: We analyze a firm’s pricing decisions when consumers either purchase full-sized options sequentially or bypass that process via a sample box. We use dynamic programming to analyze consumers’ search problem (in the absence of a sample box) and nonlinear optimization to analyze the firm’s problem. Results: As anticipated, the informational value of a sample box yields an optimal price premium relative to the prices of individual products. Despite this price premium, we show that the firm’s expected profit may decrease because a sample box accelerates consumer learning, and thus, it may help consumers settle upon an outside option earlier. We establish that a firm can reverse the potential adverse profit impact of selling sample boxes by introducing an optimally specified future credit. Managerial implications: Offering sample boxes is a common practice in retailing. Contrasting the resulting expected profits with and without the sample box option, our results highlight that managers may be ill-advised to offer a sample box in the absence of the future credit mechanism. This study is the first to address the pricing of sample boxes and show the optimality of offering credit toward a subsequent purchase. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1206 .","PeriodicalId":119284,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing & Service Operations Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1206","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Problem definition: Consumers often try a few varieties of an experience product before establishing a shopping routine. In retailing, a sample box typically refers to a package of multiple trial-sized varieties within a product category. Sample boxes potentially create value by helping consumers resolve their uncertainties regarding these varieties earlier and at a lower cost. In this paper, we study how firms and consumers share this added value under different market scenarios. We also derive the optimal pricing of sample boxes in product categories for which consumers make ongoing purchases over time. Academic/practical relevance: We thus extend the literature by proposing a framework that integrates sequential search and seller-induced learning. Methodology: We analyze a firm’s pricing decisions when consumers either purchase full-sized options sequentially or bypass that process via a sample box. We use dynamic programming to analyze consumers’ search problem (in the absence of a sample box) and nonlinear optimization to analyze the firm’s problem. Results: As anticipated, the informational value of a sample box yields an optimal price premium relative to the prices of individual products. Despite this price premium, we show that the firm’s expected profit may decrease because a sample box accelerates consumer learning, and thus, it may help consumers settle upon an outside option earlier. We establish that a firm can reverse the potential adverse profit impact of selling sample boxes by introducing an optimally specified future credit. Managerial implications: Offering sample boxes is a common practice in retailing. Contrasting the resulting expected profits with and without the sample box option, our results highlight that managers may be ill-advised to offer a sample box in the absence of the future credit mechanism. This study is the first to address the pricing of sample boxes and show the optimality of offering credit toward a subsequent purchase. Supplemental Material: The online appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1206 .
零售样盒:通过未来信用抵消加速学习的不利影响
问题定义:消费者在建立购物习惯之前,通常会尝试几种不同的体验产品。在零售业中,样品盒通常是指一个产品类别中包含多个试用大小的品种的包装。样品盒通过帮助消费者以更低的成本更早地解决他们对这些品种的不确定性,从而潜在地创造价值。本文研究了在不同的市场情景下,企业和消费者如何分享这一附加价值。我们还推导出消费者在一段时间内持续购买的产品类别中样品盒的最优定价。学术/实践相关性:因此,我们通过提出一个整合顺序搜索和卖方诱导学习的框架来扩展文献。方法:我们分析了当消费者依次购买全尺寸期权或通过样品盒绕过该过程时,公司的定价决策。我们使用动态规划分析消费者的搜索问题(在没有样本盒的情况下),并使用非线性优化分析企业的问题。结果:正如预期的那样,样本盒的信息价值相对于单个产品的价格产生了最优的价格溢价。尽管存在这种价格溢价,但我们表明,公司的预期利润可能会下降,因为样品盒加速了消费者的学习,因此,它可能有助于消费者更早地选择外部选项。我们建立了一个公司可以扭转销售样品盒的潜在不利的利润影响,通过引入一个最优指定的未来信贷。管理启示:提供样品盒是零售业的常见做法。对比有和没有样本箱选项的预期利润,我们的结果强调,在缺乏未来信用机制的情况下,管理者提供样本箱可能是不明智的。这项研究是第一个解决样品盒的定价问题,并展示了为后续购买提供信贷的最优性。补充材料:在线附录可在https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2023.1206上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信