Comparing interactive computer services—Theoretical, technical and economic feasibility

S. Mamrak, P. Amer
{"title":"Comparing interactive computer services—Theoretical, technical and economic feasibility","authors":"S. Mamrak, P. Amer","doi":"10.1109/MARK.1979.8817306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The comparison of interactive computer services is a frequent, important and essential activity for those involved in selecting from among alternative remote access services available through a computer network. The comparison and selection process can be very complicated, relying on both nonmeasurable and measurable comparison criteria. Non-measurable criteria, such as the availability of a particular compiler, are typically easy and inexpensive to evaluate. In contrast, for those criteria which are measurable, comparison calls for an expensive process of collecting and analyzing relevant performance measurements from the network computer services under consideration. (The term \"network computer services\" is used to refer to interactive computer services available via a computer network). Further, if measurement is not carefully planned to accommodate certain inherent theoretical, technical and economic problems, the measurements which result may be misleading or invalid. A legitimate question arises as to whether comparison measurements should be done at all. This paper addresses the feasibility of including measurement phases in the process of comparing and selecting interactive network computer services.","PeriodicalId":341008,"journal":{"name":"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1979-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"1979 International Workshop on Managing Requirements Knowledge (MARK)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MARK.1979.8817306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The comparison of interactive computer services is a frequent, important and essential activity for those involved in selecting from among alternative remote access services available through a computer network. The comparison and selection process can be very complicated, relying on both nonmeasurable and measurable comparison criteria. Non-measurable criteria, such as the availability of a particular compiler, are typically easy and inexpensive to evaluate. In contrast, for those criteria which are measurable, comparison calls for an expensive process of collecting and analyzing relevant performance measurements from the network computer services under consideration. (The term "network computer services" is used to refer to interactive computer services available via a computer network). Further, if measurement is not carefully planned to accommodate certain inherent theoretical, technical and economic problems, the measurements which result may be misleading or invalid. A legitimate question arises as to whether comparison measurements should be done at all. This paper addresses the feasibility of including measurement phases in the process of comparing and selecting interactive network computer services.
比较交互式计算机服务——理论、技术和经济可行性
对交互式计算机服务进行比较,对于那些参与从可通过计算机网络提供的各种远程访问服务中进行选择的人来说,是一项经常、重要和必要的活动。比较和选择过程可能非常复杂,依赖于不可测量和可测量的比较标准。不可测量的标准,例如特定编译器的可用性,通常很容易且成本低廉。相比之下,对于那些可衡量的标准,比较需要一个昂贵的过程,即从所考虑的网络计算机服务收集和分析有关的业绩衡量。(术语“网络计算机服务”是指通过计算机网络提供的交互式计算机服务)。此外,如果测量没有仔细计划以适应某些固有的理论、技术和经济问题,测量结果可能会产生误导或无效。一个合理的问题是,是否应该进行比较测量。本文探讨了在交互式网络计算机服务的比较和选择过程中纳入测量阶段的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信