Foreign Policy and Domination

Barbara Buckinx
{"title":"Foreign Policy and Domination","authors":"Barbara Buckinx","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198800613.003.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Foreign policy, even when well-intentioned, operates beyond the control of the individuals whose lives it affects, and this makes it suspect from a republican-cosmopolitan standpoint. When a republican state aspires to avoid dominating others, may it still formulate its own foreign policy? This chapter suggests that there are two ways forward for preserving space for independent foreign policy. The first proposal parses categories of foreign policy initiatives according to their dominating effects in order to (cautiously) permit some and prohibit others. The second proposal conceives of a ‘licensing regime’ to signal which states have reliably displayed a robust commitment to non-domination in their dealings with others, and thus which states may be granted more leeway in formulating independent foreign policy than others.","PeriodicalId":332779,"journal":{"name":"The State and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The State and Cosmopolitan Responsibilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198800613.003.0015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foreign policy, even when well-intentioned, operates beyond the control of the individuals whose lives it affects, and this makes it suspect from a republican-cosmopolitan standpoint. When a republican state aspires to avoid dominating others, may it still formulate its own foreign policy? This chapter suggests that there are two ways forward for preserving space for independent foreign policy. The first proposal parses categories of foreign policy initiatives according to their dominating effects in order to (cautiously) permit some and prohibit others. The second proposal conceives of a ‘licensing regime’ to signal which states have reliably displayed a robust commitment to non-domination in their dealings with others, and thus which states may be granted more leeway in formulating independent foreign policy than others.
外交政策与统治
外交政策,即使是出于善意,也会超出受其影响的个人的控制范围,这使得它从共和党-世界主义的角度来看受到怀疑。当一个共和国家渴望避免支配他人时,它还能制定自己的外交政策吗?本章表明,有两种方法可以为独立的外交政策保留空间。第一项建议根据其主导作用分析外交政策倡议的类别,以便(谨慎地)允许一些,禁止另一些。第二种建议设想了一种“许可制度”,以表明哪些国家在与其他国家打交道时可靠地表现出不受支配的坚定承诺,从而哪些国家在制定独立外交政策方面可能比其他国家有更多的回旋余地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信