{"title":"Self-organized ICIC for SCN","authors":"L. Giupponi, A. Imran, A. Galindo","doi":"10.1017/CBO9781107297333.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years the use of data services in mobile networks has notably increased, which requires a higher quality of services and data throughput capacity from operators. These requirements become much more demanding in indoor environments, where, due to the wall-penetration losses, communications suffer a higher detriment. As a solution, short-range base stations (BSs), known as femto cells [1], are proposed. Femto cells are installed by the end consumer and communicate with the macro cell system through the internet by means of a digital subscriber line (DSL), fiber, or cable connection. Due to this deployment model, the number and location of femto cells are unknown for the operators and therefore there is no possibility for centralized network planning. In the case of co-channel operation, which is the more rewarding option for operators in terms of spectral efficiency, an aggregated interference problem may arise due to multiple, simultaneous, and uncoordinated femto cell transmissions. On the other hand, the macro cell network can also cause significant interference to the femto cell system due to a lack of control of position of the femto nodes and their users. In this chapter we focus then on the challenging problem in the area of small cell networks, the inter-cell interference coordination among different layers of the network. We propose two different self-organizing solutions, based on two smart techniques that operate on the most appropriate configuration parameters of the network for each situation. In particular, we address femto–macro and macro–femto problems. On the one hand, for the femto–macro case, we propose in Section 16.1 a machine learning (ML) approach to optimize the transmission power levels by modeling the multiple femto BSs as a multi-agent system [2], where each femto cell is able to learn transmission power policy in such a way that the interference it is generating, added to the whole femto cell network interference, does not jeopardize the macro cell system performance. To do this, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) category of solutions [3], known as time-difference learning. On the other hand, for the macro–femto problem, we propose in Section 16.2 a solution based on interference minimization through self-organization of antenna parameters. In homogeneous macro cell networks, BS antenna parameters are configured in the planning and deployment phase and left unchanged for a long time. This approach works well for homogeneous networks, as the topology of the system remains unchanged over a long time. However, this is not the case in heterogeneous networks where different layers of the networks are deployed and configured in an impromptu manner and based on the timely conditions of the environment. Consequently, the density, locations, and activity levels of the small cells may change over space and time. Hence","PeriodicalId":315180,"journal":{"name":"Design and Deployment of Small Cell Networks","volume":"114 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design and Deployment of Small Cell Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107297333.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In recent years the use of data services in mobile networks has notably increased, which requires a higher quality of services and data throughput capacity from operators. These requirements become much more demanding in indoor environments, where, due to the wall-penetration losses, communications suffer a higher detriment. As a solution, short-range base stations (BSs), known as femto cells [1], are proposed. Femto cells are installed by the end consumer and communicate with the macro cell system through the internet by means of a digital subscriber line (DSL), fiber, or cable connection. Due to this deployment model, the number and location of femto cells are unknown for the operators and therefore there is no possibility for centralized network planning. In the case of co-channel operation, which is the more rewarding option for operators in terms of spectral efficiency, an aggregated interference problem may arise due to multiple, simultaneous, and uncoordinated femto cell transmissions. On the other hand, the macro cell network can also cause significant interference to the femto cell system due to a lack of control of position of the femto nodes and their users. In this chapter we focus then on the challenging problem in the area of small cell networks, the inter-cell interference coordination among different layers of the network. We propose two different self-organizing solutions, based on two smart techniques that operate on the most appropriate configuration parameters of the network for each situation. In particular, we address femto–macro and macro–femto problems. On the one hand, for the femto–macro case, we propose in Section 16.1 a machine learning (ML) approach to optimize the transmission power levels by modeling the multiple femto BSs as a multi-agent system [2], where each femto cell is able to learn transmission power policy in such a way that the interference it is generating, added to the whole femto cell network interference, does not jeopardize the macro cell system performance. To do this, we propose a reinforcement learning (RL) category of solutions [3], known as time-difference learning. On the other hand, for the macro–femto problem, we propose in Section 16.2 a solution based on interference minimization through self-organization of antenna parameters. In homogeneous macro cell networks, BS antenna parameters are configured in the planning and deployment phase and left unchanged for a long time. This approach works well for homogeneous networks, as the topology of the system remains unchanged over a long time. However, this is not the case in heterogeneous networks where different layers of the networks are deployed and configured in an impromptu manner and based on the timely conditions of the environment. Consequently, the density, locations, and activity levels of the small cells may change over space and time. Hence