RESPONSABILIZAÇÃO 360°: DESDOBRAMENTOS DE UM MOVIMENTO RESPONSIVO DISSUASÓRIO ESTIMULADO PELA AUTORIDADE DE DEFESA DA CONCORRÊNCIA

Vivian Anne Fraga, Nascimento Arruda, M. Barbosa, Castro Zenkner, Fundação Getúlio, Rio de Janeiro., Rj, Brasil Marco, Volpini Micheli, Dr. Luis Henrique, Bertolino Braido, Vargas Fgv, Direito Concorrencial
{"title":"RESPONSABILIZAÇÃO 360°: DESDOBRAMENTOS DE UM MOVIMENTO RESPONSIVO DISSUASÓRIO ESTIMULADO PELA AUTORIDADE DE DEFESA DA CONCORRÊNCIA","authors":"Vivian Anne Fraga, Nascimento Arruda, M. Barbosa, Castro Zenkner, Fundação Getúlio, Rio de Janeiro., Rj, Brasil Marco, Volpini Micheli, Dr. Luis Henrique, Bertolino Braido, Vargas Fgv, Direito Concorrencial","doi":"10.52896/rdc.v11i1.1035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: Like other jurisdictions and international bodies, Brazilian competition law characterizes bid-rigging cartels as the most serious type of anticompetitive conduct. Supported by the complex and multifaceted applicable legal framework, the competent national authority – the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (Cade) – has been proactively and diligently exercising initiatives for a holistic accountability of cartelists. Integrated with the legal system of multiple persecution of such agents, Cade has provoked individuals, organizations, and other governmental bodies, encouraging them, within the limits of their own respective competences and attributions, to seek sanctions of a civil, criminal nature and in the other administrative fronts. Objective: The text aims – through a dense empirical analysis – at confirming the occurrence of this important institutional movement of the authority in promoting a holistic legal accountability of offenders. This institutional movement herewith referred to as “Accountability 360°” is fully integrated into a legal and legislative framework that provides for multiple punitive responses to the cartel: administratively, criminally, and reparative (by means of civil liability). Method: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of cartel cases in public tenders decided by CADE’s Tribunal in the last five years. Based on CADE’s Electronic Information System (SEI) search tool, the percentage of cases in which the authority effectively promoted the 360° Accountability was checked and, in a complementary way, the merits of the decisions were analyzed. Conclusions: The results place Cade in a protagonist role of a holistic enforcement in the fight against bid-rigging cartels. In this role, the authority sanctions cartelists under the scope of the antitrust law and makes use of the multifaceted applicable legal system that provides for sanctions of various orders, such as criminal, administrative, and civil.","PeriodicalId":260841,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Defesa da Concorrência","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Defesa da Concorrência","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52896/rdc.v11i1.1035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Like other jurisdictions and international bodies, Brazilian competition law characterizes bid-rigging cartels as the most serious type of anticompetitive conduct. Supported by the complex and multifaceted applicable legal framework, the competent national authority – the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (Cade) – has been proactively and diligently exercising initiatives for a holistic accountability of cartelists. Integrated with the legal system of multiple persecution of such agents, Cade has provoked individuals, organizations, and other governmental bodies, encouraging them, within the limits of their own respective competences and attributions, to seek sanctions of a civil, criminal nature and in the other administrative fronts. Objective: The text aims – through a dense empirical analysis – at confirming the occurrence of this important institutional movement of the authority in promoting a holistic legal accountability of offenders. This institutional movement herewith referred to as “Accountability 360°” is fully integrated into a legal and legislative framework that provides for multiple punitive responses to the cartel: administratively, criminally, and reparative (by means of civil liability). Method: Quantitative and qualitative analysis of cartel cases in public tenders decided by CADE’s Tribunal in the last five years. Based on CADE’s Electronic Information System (SEI) search tool, the percentage of cases in which the authority effectively promoted the 360° Accountability was checked and, in a complementary way, the merits of the decisions were analyzed. Conclusions: The results place Cade in a protagonist role of a holistic enforcement in the fight against bid-rigging cartels. In this role, the authority sanctions cartelists under the scope of the antitrust law and makes use of the multifaceted applicable legal system that provides for sanctions of various orders, such as criminal, administrative, and civil.
360°问责制:由竞争管理局刺激的威慑反应运动的发展
背景:与其他司法管辖区和国际机构一样,巴西竞争法将串通投标的卡特尔定性为最严重的反竞争行为。在复杂和多方面的适用法律框架的支持下,主管的国家当局- -经济防御行政委员会(Cade) - -一直在积极和勤奋地采取主动行动,对卡特尔分子实行全面的问责制。结合对这些代理人的多重迫害的法律体系,Cade激怒了个人,组织和其他政府机构,鼓励他们在各自的权限和归属范围内寻求民事,刑事性质和其他行政战线的制裁。目的:本文旨在- -通过密集的实证分析- -确认当局在促进对罪犯的全面法律问责方面的这一重要体制运动的发生。这一制度运动在此被称为“360°问责制”,它完全融入了一个法律和立法框架,该框架提供了对卡特尔的多种惩罚性反应:行政、刑事和赔偿(通过民事责任)。方法:对近五年来CADE审裁处裁定的公开招标中的卡特尔案件进行定量和定性分析。基于CADE的电子信息系统(SEI)搜索工具,检查了当局有效促进360°问责制的案例百分比,并以互补的方式分析了决策的优点。结论:研究结果使凯德在打击串通投标卡特尔的整体执法中扮演主角角色。在这个角色中,当局在反垄断法的范围内制裁卡特尔者,并利用多方面的适用法律制度,规定对各种命令进行制裁,例如刑事、行政和民事命令。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信