PENEMUAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM TERHADAP KASUS CAROK AKIBAT SENGKETA TANAH DALAM MASYARAKA MADURA

M. Afif
{"title":"PENEMUAN HUKUM OLEH HAKIM TERHADAP KASUS CAROK AKIBAT SENGKETA TANAH DALAM MASYARAKA MADURA","authors":"M. Afif","doi":"10.22216/SOUMLAW.V1I2.3714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Carok is a violent conflict of Madurese that arises and is caused by a matter of self-esteem. Carok as an institutionalization of Madurese violence, in the form of attempted murder using sharp weapons, is generally clurit. What is done by men against other men who have been considered to have committed harassment against self-esteem. The formulation of the problem of this paper is: 1) what is the occurrence of carok as a judge's consideration in making a decision in court? 2) how is the theory of legal discovery by the judge in imposing criminal decisions on carok custom cases in Surabaya? This research on scientific work, in the form of normative legal research (normative juridical). In normative juridical research, this study focused on reviewing and examining legal findings by judges on carok cases due to land disputes in the Madura community, so that later the writer could elaborate legal findings by judges against carok cases. due to land disputes in Madura society. Carok is an act that is very contrary to the criminal law in Indonesia, because the effect is detrimental to others, it could cause injury, and die. Judges in deciding disputes must have several stages and theories, namely the stage of analyzing a criminal act, the stage of analyzing criminal responsibility, the stage of determining criminal proceedings (the stage of contradicting, the stage of qualifying, the stage of concluding.","PeriodicalId":200615,"journal":{"name":"Soumatera Law Review","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soumatera Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22216/SOUMLAW.V1I2.3714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Carok is a violent conflict of Madurese that arises and is caused by a matter of self-esteem. Carok as an institutionalization of Madurese violence, in the form of attempted murder using sharp weapons, is generally clurit. What is done by men against other men who have been considered to have committed harassment against self-esteem. The formulation of the problem of this paper is: 1) what is the occurrence of carok as a judge's consideration in making a decision in court? 2) how is the theory of legal discovery by the judge in imposing criminal decisions on carok custom cases in Surabaya? This research on scientific work, in the form of normative legal research (normative juridical). In normative juridical research, this study focused on reviewing and examining legal findings by judges on carok cases due to land disputes in the Madura community, so that later the writer could elaborate legal findings by judges against carok cases. due to land disputes in Madura society. Carok is an act that is very contrary to the criminal law in Indonesia, because the effect is detrimental to others, it could cause injury, and die. Judges in deciding disputes must have several stages and theories, namely the stage of analyzing a criminal act, the stage of analyzing criminal responsibility, the stage of determining criminal proceedings (the stage of contradicting, the stage of qualifying, the stage of concluding.
法官对卡纳·马杜拉一场土地纠纷的法律发现
Carok是一种由自尊引起的暴力冲突。Carok作为一种制度化的马杜罗暴力,以使用尖锐武器的谋杀未遂的形式,通常是秘密的。男人对其他男人做了什么被认为是对自尊的骚扰。本文问题的提法是:1)作为法官在法庭判决中考虑因素的合法性是如何出现的?2)在泗水,法官在对海关案件施加刑事判决时的法律发现理论如何?这种科学研究工作,以规范性法律研究(normative legal research)的形式进行。在规范的司法研究中,本研究侧重于对马杜拉社区土地纠纷案件中法官的法律认定进行回顾和考察,以便日后笔者对法官对卡鲁克案件的法律认定进行阐述。因为马杜罗社会的土地纠纷。Carok是一种非常违反印度尼西亚刑法的行为,因为其影响是对他人有害的,它可能造成伤害,甚至死亡。法官在裁定纠纷时必须有几个阶段和理论,即分析犯罪行为阶段、分析刑事责任阶段、确定刑事诉讼程序阶段(矛盾阶段、定性阶段、结论阶段)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信