Hatósági előírások betartása és az üzembentartó mentesülése a kártérítési felelősség alól – a bírói gyakorlat tükrében

Réka Pusztahelyi
{"title":"Hatósági előírások betartása és az üzembentartó mentesülése a kártérítési felelősség alól – a bírói gyakorlat tükrében","authors":"Réka Pusztahelyi","doi":"10.32575/ppb.2019.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In general, the key condition is the official licensing for the lawfulness of carrying out a highly dangerous activity, even if the facts of the official license (being done or missing), of the appropriate carrying out and the operation, and of the observance of rules and regulations, remain irrelevant issues in the viewpoint of the civil law liability for damages. Our opinion is that the typical public law provisions (i.e. official licenses, official controlling) prescribing precautions, preventive measures against the source of high danger have retroactive effect – though an indirect one – upon the civil law assessment of the dangerousness of a given activity or thing, and they also have effect upon the establishing of the civil law liability for damages, which tendency is enhanced by the compulsory liability insurance as it is gaining ground. The following essay intends to deal with these issues with the help of the Hungarian judicial practice, the international legal literature, especially the theories of the mixed nature of public and civil law in the scope of liability for highly dangerous activities and the works in the field of Law and Economics.","PeriodicalId":127083,"journal":{"name":"Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Publico Bono - Magyar Közigazgatás","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32575/ppb.2019.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In general, the key condition is the official licensing for the lawfulness of carrying out a highly dangerous activity, even if the facts of the official license (being done or missing), of the appropriate carrying out and the operation, and of the observance of rules and regulations, remain irrelevant issues in the viewpoint of the civil law liability for damages. Our opinion is that the typical public law provisions (i.e. official licenses, official controlling) prescribing precautions, preventive measures against the source of high danger have retroactive effect – though an indirect one – upon the civil law assessment of the dangerousness of a given activity or thing, and they also have effect upon the establishing of the civil law liability for damages, which tendency is enhanced by the compulsory liability insurance as it is gaining ground. The following essay intends to deal with these issues with the help of the Hungarian judicial practice, the international legal literature, especially the theories of the mixed nature of public and civil law in the scope of liability for highly dangerous activities and the works in the field of Law and Economics.
一般来说,关键条件是进行高度危险活动的合法性的官方许可,即使官方许可的事实(是否获得或丢失),适当的开展和操作,以及遵守规则和条例,从民事损害赔偿责任的角度来看仍然是无关的问题。我们的观点是,典型的公法规定(即官方许可、官方控制)对高度危险源规定了预防措施和预防措施,对民法对特定活动或事物危险性的评估具有追溯效力(尽管是间接的),它们也对民法损害赔偿责任的确立具有追溯效力,随着强制责任保险的发展,这一趋势得到了加强。本文拟借助匈牙利的司法实践、国际法律文献,特别是关于高度危险活动责任范围的公法和民法混合性质的理论以及法学和经济学领域的著作来处理这些问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信