THE MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN ENGLAND

Miodrag N. Simović, Amna Hrustić
{"title":"THE MAIN CHARACTERISTICS OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN ENGLAND","authors":"Miodrag N. Simović, Amna Hrustić","doi":"10.7251/god2042007s","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The thematic concept of the Paper consists of legal issues related to criminal proceedings in England, which are the so-called pure adversarial proceedings. These proceedings differ from the law of the continental European countries and are characterized by archaisms and continuity, original common law (judicial) character, and the absence of major codifications. In this context, the paper analyzes the meaning of common law and equity law, and procedural criteria for the categorization of criminal offenses. Regarding the issue of rules and procedures for establishment of the facts, the authors pay special attention to the consideration of determining the factual background of the dispute, the burden of proof and procedural rules on the presentation of evidence. Clearly emphasizing the different classifications of evidence that can be presented be- fore the court, the authors point out that English law treats all hearings in the same way, i.e. it also brings the testimonies of the defendant and the expert wit- ness under the witness examination regime. Starting from the fact that an im- portant feature of legal principles is that in English law there is an obligatory exclusion of illegally obtained confession of the defendant from the evidence, it is concluded that the exclusion rule is essentially a relatively exclusive rule with a large discretionary assessment of the judge. In conclusion, the authors assess that the entire evidentiary procedure, types of evidence, the manner of their collection, presentation and evaluation in English law, to a greater or lesser extent, differs from the continental criminal proceedings.","PeriodicalId":297582,"journal":{"name":"Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Banja Luci","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Godišnjak Pravnog Fakulteta u Banja Luci","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7251/god2042007s","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thematic concept of the Paper consists of legal issues related to criminal proceedings in England, which are the so-called pure adversarial proceedings. These proceedings differ from the law of the continental European countries and are characterized by archaisms and continuity, original common law (judicial) character, and the absence of major codifications. In this context, the paper analyzes the meaning of common law and equity law, and procedural criteria for the categorization of criminal offenses. Regarding the issue of rules and procedures for establishment of the facts, the authors pay special attention to the consideration of determining the factual background of the dispute, the burden of proof and procedural rules on the presentation of evidence. Clearly emphasizing the different classifications of evidence that can be presented be- fore the court, the authors point out that English law treats all hearings in the same way, i.e. it also brings the testimonies of the defendant and the expert wit- ness under the witness examination regime. Starting from the fact that an im- portant feature of legal principles is that in English law there is an obligatory exclusion of illegally obtained confession of the defendant from the evidence, it is concluded that the exclusion rule is essentially a relatively exclusive rule with a large discretionary assessment of the judge. In conclusion, the authors assess that the entire evidentiary procedure, types of evidence, the manner of their collection, presentation and evaluation in English law, to a greater or lesser extent, differs from the continental criminal proceedings.
英国刑事诉讼的主要特点
论文的主题概念包括与英国刑事诉讼有关的法律问题,即所谓的纯对抗性诉讼。这些诉讼程序不同于欧洲大陆国家的法律,其特点是古典性和延续性、原始的普通法(司法)性质以及没有主要的法典编纂。在此背景下,本文分析了普通法与衡平法的涵义,以及刑事犯罪分类的程序标准。关于确立事实的规则和程序问题,作者特别注意考虑确定争端的事实背景、举证责任和提出证据的程序规则。作者明确强调了可以在法庭上出示的证据的不同分类,并指出英国法律对所有听证会都以同样的方式对待,即它也将被告的证词和专家的证词纳入证人审查制度。从英国法理的一个重要特征即对非法取得的被告人供词实行强制性的证据排除制度出发,认为排除规则本质上是一种相对排他性的规则,具有较大的法官自由裁量能力。最后,作者评价说,英国法律的整个证据程序、证据类型、证据的收集、出示和评价方式或多或少与大陆刑事诉讼不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信