Implications of Two Opposing Variations of Neutral Theory

Jonathan Bartlett
{"title":"Implications of Two Opposing Variations of Neutral Theory","authors":"Jonathan Bartlett","doi":"10.33014/issn.2640-5652.1.1.bartlett.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This letter discusses the difference between neutral theory as an observation of present evolutionary dynamics compared to neutral theory as a more-or-less comprehensive theory of evolution.  The letter suggests that prior information, not neutral evolution itself, creates the patterns in the genome in ways that make the dynamics described by neutral theory possible in modern organisms.","PeriodicalId":114457,"journal":{"name":"Communications of the Blyth Institute","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications of the Blyth Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33014/issn.2640-5652.1.1.bartlett.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This letter discusses the difference between neutral theory as an observation of present evolutionary dynamics compared to neutral theory as a more-or-less comprehensive theory of evolution.  The letter suggests that prior information, not neutral evolution itself, creates the patterns in the genome in ways that make the dynamics described by neutral theory possible in modern organisms.
中性理论的两种对立变体的含义
这封信讨论了中立理论与中立理论之间的区别,中立理论是对当前进化动态的观察,而中立理论是一种或多或少全面的进化理论。这封信表明,是先验信息,而不是中性进化本身,创造了基因组中的模式,使中性理论所描述的动态在现代生物体中成为可能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信