发布求助
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献

Leaving the path of optimality calculation: A commentary on Fenton‐O'Creevy and Tuckett, 2021: Selecting futures: The role of conviction, narratives, ambivalence, and constructive doubt

FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE Pub Date : 2022-02-24 DOI:10.1002/ffo2.125
Jens Beckert
{"title":"Leaving the path of optimality calculation: A commentary on Fenton‐O'Creevy and Tuckett, 2021: Selecting futures: The role of conviction, narratives, ambivalence, and constructive doubt","authors":"Jens Beckert","doi":"10.1002/ffo2.125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":405512,"journal":{"name":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
分享
查看原文 本刊更多论文
离开最优计算的路径:对芬顿-奥克里维和塔克特的评论，2021:选择未来:信念，叙事，矛盾心理和建设性怀疑的作用
本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE
FUTURES & FORESIGHT SCIENCE
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整，为了账户安全，请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们：info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务，方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号：481959085
Book学术官方微信