Validación de cuestionario por juicio de expertos: Perfil del Enfermero/a que labora en el Servicio de Emergencia y Urgencias

Gladys Esther Patiño Villalva, Eduard Lambert, Fanny Lorena Cantos Espinoza, Pablo Enrique Bolaños Dominguez, Juana del Carmen Barrera Medina, Hernán Santiago Segarra Cevallos
{"title":"Validación de cuestionario por juicio de expertos: Perfil del Enfermero/a que labora en el Servicio de Emergencia y Urgencias","authors":"Gladys Esther Patiño Villalva, Eduard Lambert, Fanny Lorena Cantos Espinoza, Pablo Enrique Bolaños Dominguez, Juana del Carmen Barrera Medina, Hernán Santiago Segarra Cevallos","doi":"10.14410/2020.12.3.ao.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Nursing professionals that work in Emergency and Urgency services, daily carry out direct patient care, in a high stimuli situation and permanent work pressure; therefore it is important to develop a questionnaire that helps establishing an adequate scientific, technical and ethical profile, for nurses who work in Emergency and Urgency hospital areas. METHODS: The aim of this study was to validate a questionnaire able to identify the profile that Emergency and Urgency Services nurses should have. The questionnaire consisted of 32 items, and was validated by 4 experts; Fleiss Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement between judges. RESULTS: One of the items ( question No.12) was inadequate for all of the judges and had to be withdrawn; 5 items (questions 1,5,9,11 and 19) needed changes, so in accordance with the judges requirements, these changes were made; a total of 26 items obtained an “almost perfect” concordance of totally adequate items. CONCLUSION: The original questionnaire ended with a total of 31 items and has the required content validity. This questionnaire can be validated in the construct through the use of a pilot test applied to nurses in Emergency and Urgency services. This questionnaire makes it possible to evaluate the profile of the nursing staff prior to working in the emergency area. http://dx.doi.org/ KEYWORDS: Emergency nursing, expert testimony, validation study","PeriodicalId":417745,"journal":{"name":"Revista Médica del Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Médica del Hospital José Carrasco Arteaga","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14410/2020.12.3.ao.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nursing professionals that work in Emergency and Urgency services, daily carry out direct patient care, in a high stimuli situation and permanent work pressure; therefore it is important to develop a questionnaire that helps establishing an adequate scientific, technical and ethical profile, for nurses who work in Emergency and Urgency hospital areas. METHODS: The aim of this study was to validate a questionnaire able to identify the profile that Emergency and Urgency Services nurses should have. The questionnaire consisted of 32 items, and was validated by 4 experts; Fleiss Kappa coefficient was used to evaluate the agreement between judges. RESULTS: One of the items ( question No.12) was inadequate for all of the judges and had to be withdrawn; 5 items (questions 1,5,9,11 and 19) needed changes, so in accordance with the judges requirements, these changes were made; a total of 26 items obtained an “almost perfect” concordance of totally adequate items. CONCLUSION: The original questionnaire ended with a total of 31 items and has the required content validity. This questionnaire can be validated in the construct through the use of a pilot test applied to nurses in Emergency and Urgency services. This questionnaire makes it possible to evaluate the profile of the nursing staff prior to working in the emergency area. http://dx.doi.org/ KEYWORDS: Emergency nursing, expert testimony, validation study
专家判断问卷的验证:在紧急和紧急服务中工作的护士的概况
背景:在急诊和紧急服务部门工作的护理专业人员,每天在高刺激的情况下和长期的工作压力下直接护理病人;因此,重要的是编制一份调查表,帮助在急诊和紧急医院工作的护士建立充分的科学、技术和道德概况。方法:本研究的目的是验证一份能够确定急诊和紧急服务护士应该具备的概况的问卷。问卷共32项,由4位专家进行验证;采用Fleiss Kappa系数评价法官之间的一致性。结果:其中一题(问题12)不适合所有评委,需要撤回;题1、题5、题9、题11、题19有5项需要修改,根据评委要求进行修改;总共有26个项目获得了完全充足项目的“近乎完美”的一致性。结论:原问卷共31项,具有要求的内容效度。该问卷可以通过使用适用于急诊和紧急服务护士的试点测试在结构中进行验证。这一调查问卷可以在护理人员进入急救区工作之前评估其个人情况。http://dx.doi.org/关键词:急诊护理,专家证词,验证研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信