[In vitro cytotoxicity of denture adhesives].

H Kakiuchi, K Imai
{"title":"[In vitro cytotoxicity of denture adhesives].","authors":"H Kakiuchi,&nbsp;K Imai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cell recovery from damage induced by four types of commercial denture adhesives (three powder types, three rubber types, two cream types and one tape type) was studied in vitro, using 3 tissue culture cell lines (L-929 cells, HEp-2 cells and Gin-1 cells). After cultivation with a denture adhesive for two hours, the cells were transferred to a normal culture environment, and their growth was evaluated. Two cytotoxicity tests, i.e., agar overlay test and extraction method, were also carried out. The pH value of the extract was moderately acidic in one powder type (Faston). By contrast, the extracts of the other types were in the neutral range. Cell recovery hardly occurred in the rubber type adhesives and, moderate in the powder types. Slight recovery was noted with the cream types and the tape type. The results of the agar overlay test and the extraction method differed from those of the cell recovery test. The powder type showed marked inhibition of cell growth. The effects of other specimens decreased in the tape type, cream types and rubber types. In the extraction method, the extracts obtained from each specimen did not affect cell growth. Among the cells used, Gin-1 cells showed a slightly higher rate of cell recovery. The discrepancy among the results obtained by the different methods was considered to be due to the state of the specimen and differences in testing conditions. This indicates the importance of selecting an appropriate testing method.</p>","PeriodicalId":77622,"journal":{"name":"Shika zairyo, kikai = Journal of the Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices","volume":"9 2","pages":"146-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shika zairyo, kikai = Journal of the Japanese Society for Dental Materials and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cell recovery from damage induced by four types of commercial denture adhesives (three powder types, three rubber types, two cream types and one tape type) was studied in vitro, using 3 tissue culture cell lines (L-929 cells, HEp-2 cells and Gin-1 cells). After cultivation with a denture adhesive for two hours, the cells were transferred to a normal culture environment, and their growth was evaluated. Two cytotoxicity tests, i.e., agar overlay test and extraction method, were also carried out. The pH value of the extract was moderately acidic in one powder type (Faston). By contrast, the extracts of the other types were in the neutral range. Cell recovery hardly occurred in the rubber type adhesives and, moderate in the powder types. Slight recovery was noted with the cream types and the tape type. The results of the agar overlay test and the extraction method differed from those of the cell recovery test. The powder type showed marked inhibition of cell growth. The effects of other specimens decreased in the tape type, cream types and rubber types. In the extraction method, the extracts obtained from each specimen did not affect cell growth. Among the cells used, Gin-1 cells showed a slightly higher rate of cell recovery. The discrepancy among the results obtained by the different methods was considered to be due to the state of the specimen and differences in testing conditions. This indicates the importance of selecting an appropriate testing method.

义齿黏合剂的体外细胞毒性研究。
采用3种组织培养细胞系(L-929细胞、HEp-2细胞和Gin-1细胞),体外研究了4种商用义齿黏合剂(3种粉末型、3种橡胶型、2种乳膏型和1种胶带型)诱导损伤后的细胞恢复情况。用义齿粘接剂培养2小时后,将细胞转移到正常培养环境中,观察细胞的生长情况。进行了琼脂覆盖试验和提取法两种细胞毒性试验。提取液的pH值为中酸性,为一种粉末状(Faston)。相比之下,其他类型的提取物在中性范围内。橡胶型胶粘剂的细胞回收率较低,粉末型胶粘剂的细胞回收率较低。乳膏型和胶带型均有轻微的恢复。琼脂覆盖试验和提取方法的结果与细胞回收试验的结果不同。粉末型对细胞生长有明显的抑制作用。胶带型、奶油型和橡胶型对其他试件的影响较小。在提取方法中,从每个标本中提取的提取物不影响细胞生长。在所使用的细胞中,Gin-1细胞的细胞恢复率略高。不同方法得到的结果之间的差异被认为是由于试样的状态和测试条件的差异。这表明了选择合适的测试方法的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信