Clinical experience with preterm formulas in very low birthweight infants.

M Mercado, V Y Yu, A Gill
{"title":"Clinical experience with preterm formulas in very low birthweight infants.","authors":"M Mercado,&nbsp;V Y Yu,&nbsp;A Gill","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infants below 1500 g at birth were randomly assigned to receive one of two preterm infant formulars: S26 Low Birthweight (S26-LBW, 25 infants) or Enfalac Premature (EPF, 24 infants). They were either exclusively formula-fed (13 infants) or the formula was used to supplement their own mother's fresh breast milk (36 infants). The mean age when milk feeds were commenced was 7 days and the mean age when birthweight was regained was 12 days. The mean age when 2000 g was reached was 45 days at which time 10 (20%) infants were below the tenth centile on the intrauterine growth chart. None of the above variables were significantly different between the S26-LBW and EPF groups. However, the S26-LBW group established full enteral feeding significantly earlier compared to the EPF group (42 versus 64 d) and the number with adverse gastrointestinal effects was lower (4 versus 10 infants). Both preterm infant formulas supported a growth rate in excess of that in utero without stressing the infants' metabolic system. The growth rate of infants fed preterm breast milk supplemented with preterm infant formula was quantitatively similar to those exclusively fed preterm infant formula.</p>","PeriodicalId":76683,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of the Singapore Paediatric Society","volume":"32 3-4","pages":"137-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of the Singapore Paediatric Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Infants below 1500 g at birth were randomly assigned to receive one of two preterm infant formulars: S26 Low Birthweight (S26-LBW, 25 infants) or Enfalac Premature (EPF, 24 infants). They were either exclusively formula-fed (13 infants) or the formula was used to supplement their own mother's fresh breast milk (36 infants). The mean age when milk feeds were commenced was 7 days and the mean age when birthweight was regained was 12 days. The mean age when 2000 g was reached was 45 days at which time 10 (20%) infants were below the tenth centile on the intrauterine growth chart. None of the above variables were significantly different between the S26-LBW and EPF groups. However, the S26-LBW group established full enteral feeding significantly earlier compared to the EPF group (42 versus 64 d) and the number with adverse gastrointestinal effects was lower (4 versus 10 infants). Both preterm infant formulas supported a growth rate in excess of that in utero without stressing the infants' metabolic system. The growth rate of infants fed preterm breast milk supplemented with preterm infant formula was quantitatively similar to those exclusively fed preterm infant formula.

极低出生体重儿早产儿配方奶的临床经验。
出生时体重低于1500克的婴儿被随机分配使用两种早产儿配方奶粉中的一种:S26低出生体重(S26- lbw, 25名婴儿)或Enfalac早产儿(EPF, 24名婴儿)。他们要么完全用配方奶粉喂养(13名婴儿),要么用配方奶粉补充自己母亲的新鲜母乳(36名婴儿)。开始母乳喂养的平均年龄为7日龄,恢复出生体重的平均年龄为12日龄。达到2000 g时的平均年龄为45天,此时10名(20%)婴儿在宫内生长图表上低于第10百分位。S26-LBW组与EPF组之间上述变量均无显著差异。然而,与EPF组相比,S26-LBW组建立完全肠内喂养的时间明显早于EPF组(42天和64天),出现不良胃肠道反应的婴儿数量也较低(4对10)。两种早产儿配方奶粉都支持超过子宫内的生长速度,而不会对婴儿的代谢系统造成压力。以早产儿母乳喂养并添加早产儿配方奶粉的婴儿的生长速度在数量上与纯喂养早产儿配方奶粉的婴儿相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信