Comparative study between peroneus longus, semitendinosus tendon, and quadriceps tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: short-term results
{"title":"Comparative study between peroneus longus, semitendinosus tendon, and quadriceps tendon graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: short-term results","authors":"A. Waly, H. Gawish","doi":"10.4103/eoj.eoj_127_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Several graft options exist for ACL. The traditional options are patellar tendon (PT), hamstring tendons (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT). Nevertheless, they have some disadvantages. In recent decades, several efforts were exerted to find more graft sources for ACL reconstruction. One of these grafts is the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft. This study was done to compare the results of soft tissue grafts; HT, PLT and QT for ACLR. Patients and Methods This is a prospective comparative study over 75 patients with deficient anterior cruciate ligament. Patients were admitted to El Hadra University Hospital between June 2019 till September 2020. Patients were classified randomly into 3 groups. The first group (Group A) were treated with ACLR using hamstring tendon (n=25). The second group (Group B) were treated using peroneus longus autograft (n=25). The third group (Group C) were treated using quadriceps tendon graft. All groups were matched for age, gender and duration from injury to surgery. Functional evaluation was done using Lysholm score, modified Cincinnati scale, IKDC score and VAS. The functional score of the ankle was assessed with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index score at the end of follow up. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC, VAS, Kujala scores. However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding the SCAR score. Conclusion Peroneus longus tendon is a reliable alternative for ACL reconstruction especially in patients with inadequate or prematurely amputated hamstring autograft.","PeriodicalId":171084,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Orthopaedic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/eoj.eoj_127_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background Several graft options exist for ACL. The traditional options are patellar tendon (PT), hamstring tendons (HT) and quadriceps tendon (QT). Nevertheless, they have some disadvantages. In recent decades, several efforts were exerted to find more graft sources for ACL reconstruction. One of these grafts is the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft. This study was done to compare the results of soft tissue grafts; HT, PLT and QT for ACLR. Patients and Methods This is a prospective comparative study over 75 patients with deficient anterior cruciate ligament. Patients were admitted to El Hadra University Hospital between June 2019 till September 2020. Patients were classified randomly into 3 groups. The first group (Group A) were treated with ACLR using hamstring tendon (n=25). The second group (Group B) were treated using peroneus longus autograft (n=25). The third group (Group C) were treated using quadriceps tendon graft. All groups were matched for age, gender and duration from injury to surgery. Functional evaluation was done using Lysholm score, modified Cincinnati scale, IKDC score and VAS. The functional score of the ankle was assessed with the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index score at the end of follow up. Results There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding the Lysholm, Tegner, IKDC, VAS, Kujala scores. However, there was a statistically significant difference regarding the SCAR score. Conclusion Peroneus longus tendon is a reliable alternative for ACL reconstruction especially in patients with inadequate or prematurely amputated hamstring autograft.
ACL有几种移植选择。传统的选择是髌骨肌腱(PT),腘绳肌腱(HT)和股四头肌肌腱(QT)。然而,它们也有一些缺点。近几十年来,为寻找更多ACL重建的移植物来源进行了多次努力。其中一种是腓骨长肌腱(PLT)自体移植。本研究是为了比较软组织移植的结果;ACLR的HT、PLT和QT。患者和方法:对75例前交叉韧带缺损患者进行前瞻性比较研究。患者于2019年6月至2020年9月期间入住埃尔哈德拉大学医院。患者随机分为3组。第一组(A组)采用腘绳肌腱ACLR治疗(n=25)。第二组(B组)采用自体腓骨长肌移植治疗(n=25)。第三组(C组)采用股四头肌肌腱移植治疗。所有组的年龄、性别和从受伤到手术的持续时间都是匹配的。功能评价采用Lysholm评分、改良辛辛那提量表、IKDC评分和VAS。随访结束时采用American Orthopedic Foot and ankle score和Foot and ankle Disability Index评分评估踝关节功能评分。结果两组患者Lysholm、Tegner、IKDC、VAS、Kujala评分比较,差异均无统计学意义。然而,在SCAR评分方面存在统计学上的显著差异。结论腓骨长肌腱是前交叉韧带重建的可靠选择,特别是在腘绳肌腱移植不充分或过早截肢的患者中。