THE IMPACT OF MIGRATION SECURITIZATION ON THE INCREASE OF ISLAMOPHOBIA-BASED ATTACKS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 2015-2019

Victoriana Melati
{"title":"THE IMPACT OF MIGRATION SECURITIZATION ON THE INCREASE OF ISLAMOPHOBIA-BASED ATTACKS IN THE UNITED STATES IN 2015-2019","authors":"Victoriana Melati","doi":"10.32787/IJIR.V4I1.118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper will discuss the United States policy under Donald Trump's administration which places migration as an agenda of securitization by restricting immigrants from entering the United States, especially Muslim immigrants. Trump firmly said to reject the entry of immigrants from six Muslim countries, namely Chad, Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia and Yemen. Trump also added that the ban on the entry of immigrants was also applied to Venezuelans and North Koreans. The step was taken by Trump with the aim of ensuring the security of the United States from various threats potentially brought by the immigrants. Then, this paper will answer the big questions about how securitization of migration affected the emergence of Islamophobia in the United States. In analyzing these problems, we use the concept of securitization of migration with four operational variables, namely: 1. Framing by speech acts, 2. Politicization of fear, 3. The impacts (positive and negative): Securitization policy and the islamophobia actions. The results of this study indicate that securitization of migration process has an impact on the increasing actions of Islamophobia-based in the United States. \n  \nKeywords: Securitization of Migration, Travel Ban Policy, Islamophobia, United States","PeriodicalId":145410,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Journal of International Relations","volume":"303 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Journal of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32787/IJIR.V4I1.118","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper will discuss the United States policy under Donald Trump's administration which places migration as an agenda of securitization by restricting immigrants from entering the United States, especially Muslim immigrants. Trump firmly said to reject the entry of immigrants from six Muslim countries, namely Chad, Iran, Libya, Syria, Somalia and Yemen. Trump also added that the ban on the entry of immigrants was also applied to Venezuelans and North Koreans. The step was taken by Trump with the aim of ensuring the security of the United States from various threats potentially brought by the immigrants. Then, this paper will answer the big questions about how securitization of migration affected the emergence of Islamophobia in the United States. In analyzing these problems, we use the concept of securitization of migration with four operational variables, namely: 1. Framing by speech acts, 2. Politicization of fear, 3. The impacts (positive and negative): Securitization policy and the islamophobia actions. The results of this study indicate that securitization of migration process has an impact on the increasing actions of Islamophobia-based in the United States.   Keywords: Securitization of Migration, Travel Ban Policy, Islamophobia, United States
移民证券化对2015-2019年美国基于伊斯兰恐惧症的袭击增加的影响
本文将讨论唐纳德·特朗普政府下的美国政策,通过限制移民进入美国,特别是穆斯林移民,将移民作为证券化议程。特朗普坚决表示要拒绝来自乍得、伊朗、利比亚、叙利亚、索马里和也门六个穆斯林国家的移民入境。特朗普还补充说,禁止移民入境的禁令也适用于委内瑞拉人和朝鲜人。特朗普采取这一措施的目的是确保美国的安全免受移民可能带来的各种威胁。然后,本文将回答有关移民证券化如何影响美国伊斯兰恐惧症出现的重大问题。在分析这些问题时,我们使用了具有四个操作变量的迁移证券化概念,即:1。2.言语行为框架;3.恐惧政治化;影响(正面和负面):证券化政策和伊斯兰恐惧症行动。本研究的结果表明,移民过程的证券化对美国以伊斯兰恐惧症为基础的日益增加的行动产生了影响。关键词:移民证券化,旅行禁令政策,伊斯兰恐惧症,美国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信