Results Based Aid: Limitations of New Approaches

S. Klingebiel
{"title":"Results Based Aid: Limitations of New Approaches","authors":"S. Klingebiel","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2181727","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current development debate, so called results based approaches play an important part. There are two aspects to this debate: On the one hand, further improving the effectiveness of development cooperation (aid) is important to the specialists, whereas on the other hand many donors (parliaments, the public etc.) continue to call for the justification of aid expenditures. This creates great pressure to give the most concrete evidence for the utility of aid budgets. It is important to distinguish between (i) Results-Based Aid (RBA) and (ii) Results-Based Service Delivery (RBSD). Even if both approaches are based on the same rationale (incentives), they are fundamentally distinct. The current international debate is focused mainly on results based aid.","PeriodicalId":309442,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Foreign Aid (Topic)","volume":"25 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Foreign Aid (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2181727","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the current development debate, so called results based approaches play an important part. There are two aspects to this debate: On the one hand, further improving the effectiveness of development cooperation (aid) is important to the specialists, whereas on the other hand many donors (parliaments, the public etc.) continue to call for the justification of aid expenditures. This creates great pressure to give the most concrete evidence for the utility of aid budgets. It is important to distinguish between (i) Results-Based Aid (RBA) and (ii) Results-Based Service Delivery (RBSD). Even if both approaches are based on the same rationale (incentives), they are fundamentally distinct. The current international debate is focused mainly on results based aid.
基于结果的辅助:新方法的局限性
在当前的发展辩论中,所谓的基于结果的方法发挥了重要作用。这场辩论有两个方面:一方面,进一步提高发展合作(援助)的有效性对专家来说很重要,而另一方面,许多捐助者(议会、公众等)继续呼吁援助支出的合理性。这就产生了巨大的压力,要求提供最具体的证据来证明援助预算的效用。区分(i)基于结果的援助(RBA)和(ii)基于结果的服务提供(RBSD)是很重要的。即使这两种方法基于相同的基本原理(激励),它们在根本上也是不同的。目前的国际辩论主要集中在基于结果的援助上。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信