Merits of Fantastic Literature: A Proposal for Theoretical Framework

Grzegorz Trębicki
{"title":"Merits of Fantastic Literature: A Proposal for Theoretical Framework","authors":"Grzegorz Trębicki","doi":"10.19195/0867-7441.28.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper attempts to set ground for a comprehensive debate on the merits of non-mimetic (fantastic) literature, tentatively proposing a system of four basic merits — the entertaining/fabulative, the emotional-cognitive, the speculative/extrapolative, and the aesthetic. These merits can also be alternatively viewed as narrative functions, precisely defined presuppositions, agreements between the implied reader and writer as to what literary gratifications are to be expected by the reader from the reading experience. They constitute structural dominants which are well manifested in the texts themselves. The author’s proposals should be read merely as certain initial approximations, albeit hopefully useful ones, capable of inspiring further debate.","PeriodicalId":141509,"journal":{"name":"Literatura i Kultura Popularna","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literatura i Kultura Popularna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19195/0867-7441.28.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper attempts to set ground for a comprehensive debate on the merits of non-mimetic (fantastic) literature, tentatively proposing a system of four basic merits — the entertaining/fabulative, the emotional-cognitive, the speculative/extrapolative, and the aesthetic. These merits can also be alternatively viewed as narrative functions, precisely defined presuppositions, agreements between the implied reader and writer as to what literary gratifications are to be expected by the reader from the reading experience. They constitute structural dominants which are well manifested in the texts themselves. The author’s proposals should be read merely as certain initial approximations, albeit hopefully useful ones, capable of inspiring further debate.
奇幻文学的优点:一个理论框架的建议
本文试图就非模仿文学(幻想文学)的优点进行全面的讨论,并初步提出了一个由四种基本优点组成的系统——娱乐/虚构、情感-认知、推测/外推和审美。这些优点也可以被看作是叙事功能,精确定义的前提,隐含的读者和作者之间关于读者从阅读体验中期望得到什么样的文学满足的协议。它们构成了结构上的优势,在文本本身中得到了很好的体现。作者的建议应该仅仅被理解为某些初步的近似,尽管希望是有用的,能够激发进一步的辩论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信