Application Ability of Students in Integrated Computer-Aided Numerical Analysis Learning

K. Kosim
{"title":"Application Ability of Students in Integrated Computer-Aided Numerical Analysis Learning","authors":"K. Kosim","doi":"10.58421/misro.v1i1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The low ability of students to apply in numerical analysis courses is a problem in this research. Integrated learning is one solution to this problem. The aim is to determine the differences in student application abilities between integrated and conventional learning. One of the computer science colleges in the Cirebon area was sampled in this study. Two groups were formed, consisting of 1 integrated study group with a total of 36 students and one conventional study group with a total of 32 students. Both groups contracted numerical analysis courses. What carried out the type of quasi-experimental research and the static group comparison randomized control group only design became the design in this study. The result is that the average value of the application ability of students who study conventionally is 80.31, while the average application ability of students who study in an integrated manner is 84.58. The application ability of students who study integrated is higher than students who study conventionally, and the ability to apply of students who study integrated is more uniform than students who study conventionally. The results of the Mann-Whitney test found that the application ability of students who studied in an integrated manner was better than those who studied conventionally.","PeriodicalId":105115,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v1i1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The low ability of students to apply in numerical analysis courses is a problem in this research. Integrated learning is one solution to this problem. The aim is to determine the differences in student application abilities between integrated and conventional learning. One of the computer science colleges in the Cirebon area was sampled in this study. Two groups were formed, consisting of 1 integrated study group with a total of 36 students and one conventional study group with a total of 32 students. Both groups contracted numerical analysis courses. What carried out the type of quasi-experimental research and the static group comparison randomized control group only design became the design in this study. The result is that the average value of the application ability of students who study conventionally is 80.31, while the average application ability of students who study in an integrated manner is 84.58. The application ability of students who study integrated is higher than students who study conventionally, and the ability to apply of students who study integrated is more uniform than students who study conventionally. The results of the Mann-Whitney test found that the application ability of students who studied in an integrated manner was better than those who studied conventionally.
学生在综合计算机辅助数值分析学习中的应用能力
学生在数值分析课程中的应用能力较低是本研究的一个问题。综合学习是解决这个问题的一种方法。目的是确定综合学习和传统学习在学生应用能力方面的差异。在这项研究中,有一所计算机科学学院被抽样调查。分为两组,1个综合学习组共36人,1个常规学习组共32人。两组均选修数值分析课程。进行了类实验研究和静态组比较的随机对照组设计成为本研究的设计。结果表明,常规学习的学生应用能力平均值为80.31,而综合学习的学生应用能力平均值为84.58。综合学习的学生应用能力高于常规学习的学生,综合学习的学生应用能力比常规学习的学生更加统一。曼-惠特尼测验的结果发现,综合学习的学生的应用能力比传统学习的学生要好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信