The Discrepancy between Observed and Predicted Heliospheric Energetic Neutral Atoms below Solar Wind Energy

A. Galli, I. Baliukin, M. Kornbleuth, M. Opher, S. Fuselier, Justyna M. Sokół, K. Dialynas, M. Dayeh, V. Izmodenov, J. Richardson
{"title":"The Discrepancy between Observed and Predicted Heliospheric Energetic Neutral Atoms below Solar Wind Energy","authors":"A. Galli, I. Baliukin, M. Kornbleuth, M. Opher, S. Fuselier, Justyna M. Sokół, K. Dialynas, M. Dayeh, V. Izmodenov, J. Richardson","doi":"10.3847/2041-8213/aced9b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measuring energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) allows for the remote observation of ion populations from the frontiers of our heliosphere. In this study, we compare the ENAs observed with the IBEX-Lo instrument onboard the Interstellar Boundary Explorer with ENA predictions from two heliosphere models. In contrast to previous studies, this paper presents model-data comparisons for the energy range 50 eV–2 keV over one full solar cycle not only in the upwind direction (Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 sky directions), but also for the north pole, south pole, port tail lobe, and downwind directions. The two heliosphere models produce the same basic result: there is a large gap (1 to 2 orders of magnitude in ENA intensity at 100 eV) between ENA data and model predictions between 100 and 500 eV for all sky directions. The reason for this gap is not understood yet. While some explanations are plausible and will be investigated in future studies, other explanations are excluded.","PeriodicalId":179976,"journal":{"name":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Astrophysical Journal Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aced9b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measuring energetic neutral atoms (ENAs) allows for the remote observation of ion populations from the frontiers of our heliosphere. In this study, we compare the ENAs observed with the IBEX-Lo instrument onboard the Interstellar Boundary Explorer with ENA predictions from two heliosphere models. In contrast to previous studies, this paper presents model-data comparisons for the energy range 50 eV–2 keV over one full solar cycle not only in the upwind direction (Voyager 1 and Voyager 2 sky directions), but also for the north pole, south pole, port tail lobe, and downwind directions. The two heliosphere models produce the same basic result: there is a large gap (1 to 2 orders of magnitude in ENA intensity at 100 eV) between ENA data and model predictions between 100 and 500 eV for all sky directions. The reason for this gap is not understood yet. While some explanations are plausible and will be investigated in future studies, other explanations are excluded.
太阳风能量以下的日球层高能中性原子的观测与预测差异
测量高能中性原子(ENAs)可以从我们的日球层边界远程观察离子种群。在这项研究中,我们将星际边界探测器上的IBEX-Lo仪器观测到的ENA与两个日球层模型的ENA预测进行了比较。与以往的研究相比,本文不仅在逆风方向(旅行者1号和旅行者2号天空方向),而且在北极、南极、左尾叶和顺风方向上,对一个完整太阳周期50 eV-2 keV能量范围的模式数据进行了比较。这两种日球层模式得出了相同的基本结果:在所有天空方向上,ENA数据与模式预测的100至500 eV之间存在很大差距(100 eV时ENA强度为1至2个数量级)。造成这种差距的原因尚不清楚。虽然有些解释是合理的,并将在未来的研究中进行调查,但其他解释被排除在外。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信